Computer models of the human body are robust tools for gaining insight into the gross motion of ground vehicle or aircraft occupants and evaluating the loads and, deformations of their critical parts. The knowledge of occupant responses will help in the determination of the type and probable causes of injuries that may he sustained during a crash. An important aspect in crash analysis is how the large motion of the relatively rigid segments of an occupant, such as the limbs, and the small deformations of flexible segments, such as the spine column, are interrelated. To this end, a general methodology for kineto-static analysis of multibody systems with flexible structures undergoing large motion and structural deformations is developed. Rigid multibody dynamics is used to predict the gross motions and displacements at the boundaries between the relatively bulky (rigid) bodies and relatively flexible ones. A mixed boundary-condition finite-element analysis is formulated and solved at every numerical integration time to determine the corresponding reaction forces and moments at the boundaries and also the structural deformations. Based on this methodology, a multibody model of the occupant with a nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine is developed for a Hybrid II anthropomorphic crash test dummy. The analytical results obtained are compared with the experimental results from the impact sled tests. Comparison of the results has shown better correlation between the analyses and the experiments compared with earlier studies.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Dynamic response, Finite element analysis, Modeling, Deformation, Aircraft, Boundary-value problems, Computers, Finite element model, Flexible structures, Lumbar spine, Multibody dynamics, Multibody systems, Stress, Vehicles, Wounds
1.
McHenry, R. R., 1963, “Analysis of Dynamics of Automobile Passenger-Restraint System,” Proceedings of 7th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 207–249.
2.
Robbins, D. H., 1970, “Three-Dimensional Simulation of Advanced Automotive Restraint System,” SAE Paper No. 700421, International Automotive Safety Conference Compendium, pp. 30.
3.
Bartz, J. A., 1971, “A Three-Dimensional Computer Simulation of a Motor Vehicle Crash Victim,” Calspan Rep. No. VJ-2978-VI, Buffalo, NY.
4.
Fleck, J. T., and Butler F. E., 1975, “Development of an Improved Computer Model of the Human Body and Extremity Dynamics,” Report No. AMRL-TR-75-14, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
5.
Wisemans, J., Maltha, J., Van Wijk, J., and Janssen, E. G., 1982, “MADYMO—A Crash Victim Simulation Computer Program for Biomechanical Research and Optimization of Designs for Impact Injury Prevention,” Proceedings of AGARD Meeting, Kooln, Germany.
6.
Laananen, D. H., Bolukbasi, A. O., and Coltman, J. W., 1982, “Computer Simulation of an Aircraft Seat and Occupant in a Crash Environment, Volume I—Technical report, TR-82401,” Simula, Inc., Tempe, Arizona; DOT/FAA/CT-82/33-I, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center, Atlantic City Airport, NJ.
7.
Laananen, D. H., 1991, “Computer Simulation of an Aircraft Seat and Occupant(s) in a Crash Environment—Program SOM-LA/SOM-TA User Manual,” DOT/FAA/CT-90/4, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center, Atlantic City Airport, NJ.
8.
Lankarani, H., Ma, D., and Menon, R., 1992, “Occupant Dynamic Responses For Evaluation of Compliance Characteristics of Aircraft Bulkheads,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 44–2.
9.
Lankarani, H., Ma, D., and Menon, R., 1993, “Biodynamic Responses for Evaluation of Aircraft Crash Safety,” Final Report. DOT/FAA/03-90-00050, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, FAA Technical Center, NJ.
10.
Lankarani
H.
,
Ma
D.
and
Menon
R.
,
1994
, “
Multi-body Dynamics of Aircraft Occupants Seated Behind Interior Walls
,”
Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics
, Vol.
1
, pp.
1
–
11
.
11.
Ma, D., Menon, R. and Lankarani, H., 1993, “Impact Dynamics of Multibody Mechanical Systems and Application to Crash Responses of Aircraft Occupant/Structure,” NATO Advanced Science Institute, Computer-Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Mechanical Systems, Tro´ia, Portugal.
12.
Stech, E. L., “Calculation of the Human Spinal Frequency from Cadaver Data and Comparisons with Tests on Live Human Subjects,” Frost Engineering Development Corporation, Report No. 122-100, 1963.
13.
Toth, R., “Multiple-Degree-of-Freedom, Nonlinear Spinal Model,” Proceedings of 19th Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 8, 1966.
14.
Hopkins, G. R., “Nonlinear Lumped-Parameter Mathematical Model of Dynamic Response of the Human Body,” Symposium on Biodynamic Models and Their Applications, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, WPAFB, Ohio, AMRL-TR-71-29, 1971.
15.
Orne
D.
, and
Liu
Y. K.
, “
A Mathematical Model of Spinal Response to Impact
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
, Vol.
4
, pp.
48
–
72
,
1971
.
16.
Prasad
P.
, and
King
A. I.
, “
An Experimental Validated Dynamic Model of the Spine
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
41
, pp.
546
–
50
,
1974
.
17.
Panjabi
M. M.
, and
White
A. A.
, “
A Mathematical Approach for Three Dimensional Analysis of the Mechanics of the Spine
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
, Vol.
4
, pp.
203
–
12
,
1971
.
18.
Luo
Z.
, and
Goldsmith
W.
, “
Reaction of a Human Head/Neck/Torso System to Shock
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
, Vol.
24
, No.
7
, pp.
499
–
510
,
1991
.
19.
Gramer
H. J.
,
Liu
Y. K.
, and
Von Rosenberg
D. U.
, “
A Distributed Parameter Model of the Inertially Loaded Human Spine
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
, Vol.
9
, pp.
115
–
130
,
1976
.
20.
Williams
J. L.
, and
Belytschko
T. B.
, “
A Three Dimensional Model of the Human Cervical Spine for Impact Simulation
,”
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
, Vol.
105
, pp.
321
–
331
,
1983
.
21.
Ueno, K., “A Three Dimensional Nonlinear Finite Element Model of Lumbar Intervertebral Joint,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, 1984.
22.
Lavaste
F.
,
Skalli
W.
,
Robin
S.
,
Roy-Camille
R.
, and
Mazel
C.
, “
Three Dimensional Geometrical and Mechanical Modeling of the Lumbar Spine
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
, Vol.
25
, No.
10
, pp.
1153
–
1164
,
1992
.
23.
Kulief
J. A.
, and
Shabana
A. A.
,
1986
, “
Impact Responses of Multibody Systems with Consistent and Lumped Masses
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
104
, No.
2
, pp.
187
–
207
.
24.
Bakr
E. M.
, and
Shabana
A. A.
,
1986
, “
Geometrically Nonlinear Analysis of Multibody Systems
,”
Computers and Structures
, Vol.
23
, pp.
739
–
751
.
25.
Nagantham
G.
, and
Soni
A. H.
,
1988
, “
Nonlinear Modelling of Kinematic and Flexibility Effects in Manipulator Design
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS, TRANSMISSIONS AND AUTOMATION IN DESIGN
, Vol.
110
, pp.
243
–
254
.
26.
Pereira, M. S., and Ambrosio, J. A. C., 1994, Computer-aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Mechanical Systems, NATO/ASI Series, Series E: Applied Sciences—Vol. 268. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27.
Pereira, M. S., and Ambrosio, J. A. C., 1993, “Computer-aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Mechanical Systems—Volume II; Contributed Papers,” Proceedings of the NATO/Advanced Science Institute, Tro´ia, Portugal, June.
28.
Ambrosio, J. A. C., 1991, “Elasto-Plastic Large Deformation of Flexible Multibody System in Crash Analysis,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona.
29.
Nikravesh, P. E., 1988, Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
30.
Shabana
A. A.
,
1983
, “
Variable Degree-of-Freedom Component Mode Analysis of Inertia Varient Flexible Mechanical System
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANISMS, TRANSMISSIONS AND AUTOMATION IN DESIGN
, Volume
105
, pp.
371
–
378
.
31.
Midoun, D. E., Abramoski, E., Rao, M. K., and Kalidindi, R., 1993, “Development of a Finite Element Based Model of the Side Impact Dummy,” ASME Paper No. 930444.
32.
“Federal Aviation Regulations—Title 14 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 23, Amendment 23-39, Section 23.562,” 1988, Federal Register, September 14.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.