This investigation focuses on the development of modifications to the Collaborative Optimization (CO) approach to multidisciplinary systems design, that will provide solution capabilities for multiobjective problems. The primary goal of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview and development of mathematically rigorous optimization strategies for Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization (MOCO). Collaborative Optimization strategies provide design optimization capabilities to discipline designers within a multidisciplinary design environment. To date these CO strategies have primarily been applied to system design problems which have a single objective function. Recent investigations involving multidisciplinary design simulators have reported success in applying CO to multiobjective system design problems. In this research three Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization (MOCO) strategies are developed, reviewed and implemented in a comparative study. The goal of this effort is to provide an in depth comparison of different MOCO strategies available to system designers. Each of the three strategies makes use of parameter sensitivities within multilevel solution strategies. In implementation studies, each of the three MOCO strategies is effective in solving a multiobjective multidisciplinary systems design problem. Results indicate that these MOCO strategies require an accurate estimation of parameter sensitivities for successful implementation. In each of the three MOCO strategies these parameter sensitivities are obtained using post-optimality analysis techniques.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Optimization, Design, Engineering disciplines, Parameter estimation
1.
Balling, R. J., and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., 1994a, “Optimization of Coupled Systems; A Critical Overview of Approaches,” AIAA-94-4330-CP, Proceedings of the 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, pp. 697–707, Panama City, Florida, September 7–9.
2.
Balling, R. J., and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., 1994b, “An Algorithm for Solving the System-level Problem in Multilevel Optimization,” AIAA-94-4333-CP, Proceedings of the 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, pp. 794–809, Panama City, Florida, September 7–9.
3.
Balling, R. J., and Wilkinson C. A., 1996, “Execution of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approaches on Common Test Problems,” AIAA-96-4033-CP, Proceedings of the 6th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, pp. 421–437, Bellevue, WA, September 4–6.
4.
Beltracchi, T. J., 1988, “An Investigation of Parametric Sensitivity Analysis by the Recursive Quadratic Programming,” Doctoral Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
5.
Braun, R. D., and Kroo, I. M., 1995, “Development and Application of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture in a Multidisciplinary Design Environment,” Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State-of-the-Art, N. Alexandrov and M. Y. Hussaini, eds., Proceedings in Applied Mathematics 80, SIAM, Philadelphia.
6.
Cramer, E. J., Dennis, Jr. J. E., Frank, P. D., et al., 1994, “Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization,” SIAM Journal of Optimization, Vol. 4.
7.
Grace, A., 1992, Optimization Toolbox for use with MATLAB, The Math Works, Inc, Natick, MA.
8.
Haftka
R. T.
,
1985
, “
Simultaneous Analysis and Design
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
23
, No.
7
, pp.
1099
–
1103
.
9.
Kroo, I., Altus, S., Braun, R., Gage, P., and Sobieski, I., 1994, “Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design,” AIAA-94-4325-CP, Proceedings of the 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, pp. 697–707, Panama City, Florida, September 7–9.
10.
Sobieski, I., and Kroo, I., 1996, “Aircraft Design using Collaborative Optimization,” AIAA-96-0715, 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 15–18, 1995, Reno, Nevada.
11.
Tappeta, R. V., and Renaud, J. E., 1996, “A Comparison of Equality Constraint Formulations for Concurrent Design Optimization,” 96-DETC/EIM-1423, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers in Engineering Conference, August 18–22, 1996, Irvine, California.
12.
Tappeta, R. V., and Renaud, J. E., 1997, “Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization,” DETC97/DAC-3772, Proceedings of the 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers in Engineering Conference, September 14–17, 1997, Sacramento, California.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.