Three dimensional rapid prototyping processes, also called layered manufacturing or solid freeform fabrication (SFF), promise designers the ability to automatically fabricate complex shapes. SFF processes were invented with the assumption that designers would submit complete part models for automated planning and manufacturing. This planning process is normally based on some form of “decomposition,” for example, slicing into layers. Especially for newer, more complex SFF processes, there are several disadvantages to this approach, primarily that decomposition is difficult and does not reliably produce good process plans. Furthermore, it is hard for the designer to get feedback on the manufacturability of his design, and today’s decomposition systems are not fully automated. This paper presents an alternative approach, “design by composition,” where users build designs from “primitives” that include high-level manufacturing plans. When the user combines two primitives with a Boolean operation, software will automatically generate a manufacturing plan for the new design from the plans for the source primitives. In contrast to the decomposition method, design by composition offers several benefits to designers, primarily access to manufacturability feedback during design-time, a greater degree of automation, the ability to create designs with embedded components (such as sensors, electronic circuits, bearings, and shafts), and enhanced control over manufacturing plans. These advantages make design by composition a more attractive approach to SFF processing, especially for designers who are new to these processes. [S1050-0472(00)01701-3]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
manufacturing processes, design for manufacture, automation, planning, machine tools
Topics:
Algorithms, Design, Manufacturing
1.
Jacobs, P. F., 1992, “Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing: Fundamentals of Stereolilthography,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI.
2.
Sachs, E., Williams, P., Brancazio, D., Cima, M., and Kremmin, K., 1990, “Three Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prorotypes Directly from a CAD Model,” Proceedings of Manufacturing International '90, pp. 131–136, Atlanta, GA, March.
3.
Merz, R., Prinz, F. B., Ramaswami, K., Terk, M., and Weiss, L., 1994, “Shape Deposition Manufacturing,” Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas at Austin, August 8–10.
4.
Requicha, A., and Voelcker, H., 1985, “Boolean Operations in Solid Modeling: Boundary Evaluation and Merging Algorithms,” Proc. IEEE, 3, No. 1.
5.
Shah, J. J., Mantyla, M., and Shah, J., 1995, Parametric and Feature Based CAD/CAM: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications, Wiley, New York, NY.
6.
Weiss, L. E., Prinz, F. B., Neplotnik, G., Padmanabhan, P., Schultz, L., and Merz, R., 1996, “Shape Deposition Manufacturing of Wearable Computers,” Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, The University of Texas at Austin, August 10–12.
7.
Marsan, A., Dutta, D., 1997 “A Survey of Process Planning Techniques for Layered Manufacturing,” Proceedings of the 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, CA.
8.
Kumar, V., Rajagopalan, S., Cutkosky, M., Dutta, D., 1998. “Representation and Processing of Heterogeneous Objects for Solid Freeform Fabrication,” IFIP WG5.2 Geometric Modeling Workshop, Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 7–9.
9.
Ramaswami, K., Yamaguchi, Y., and Prinz, F. B., 1997 “Spatial partitioning of solids for solid freeform fabrication,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications 1997, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 346–353.
10.
Cutkosky
,
M. R.
, and
Tenenbaum
,
J. M.
,
1991
, “
Providing Computational Support for Concurrent Engineering
,”
Int. J. Syst. Autom. Res. Appl.
,
1
, No.
3
, pp.
239
–
261
.
11.
Sarma
,
S.
, and
Wright
,
P. K.
,
1997
, “
Reference Free Part Encapsulation: A New Universal Fixturing Concept
,”
J. Manufac. Syst.
,
16
, No.
1
, pp.
35
–
42
.
12.
Pinilla, J. M., Kao, J. H., Binnard, M., and Prinz, F. B., 1997, “The Compact Graph Format: an Interchange Standard for Solid Freeform Fabrication,” NIST Measurement and Standards Issues in Rapid Prototyping Workshop, Gaithersburg, MD.
13.
Alexander
,
P.
,
Allen
,
S.
, and
Dutta
,
D.
,
1998
, “
Part Orientation and Build Cost Determination in Layered Manufacturing
,”
Computer Aided Design
,
30
, No.
5
, pp.
343
–
356
.
14.
Ramaswami, K., 1997, “Process Planning for Shape Deposition Manufacturing,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
15.
Ramaswami, K., and Prinz, F. B., 1995, “CNC cutter path generation in shape deposition manufacturing,” Concurrent Product and Process Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Manufacturing Engineering Division, MED 1, ASME, New York, NY, pp. 213–220.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.