Within the product development the need for generating design variants is given in many situations, for example to optimize an existing initial design with respect to new or modified requirements. For an efficient process it is essential that these variations can be done very easily within a small timeframe. In the virtual product development the physical characteristic of a component is determined by numerical simulation. Commercial software products exist for nearly each physical phenomenon. Often these methods are covered under CAE. A fundamental issue for building and analyzing variants easily and fast is a seamless interaction between the CAD and CAE software tools. This paper presents a powerful CAD/CAE sequence to the engineer’s community, where in contrast to other approaches results of the CAE analysis directly interact with CAD data. This strategy is supported by describing the product’s geometry by parameters. The CAD/CAE sequence is integrated in an optimization loop. The presented application example is an automotive part.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
computer aided engineering, product development, design engineering, CAD
Topics:
Computer-aided design, Computer-aided engineering, Design, Optimization, Product development
1.
N. N., 2003, “UG Online Documentation,” UniGraphics Solution Inc., 10824 Hope Street, Cypress, CA 90630 (see http://www.ugsolutions.com).
2.
N. N., 2002, “Catia V4 Online Documentation,” Dassault Systems, (see http://www.3ds.com).
3.
Bazaraa, M. S., Sherali, H. D., and Shetty, C. M., 1992, Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
4.
N. N., 2002: “Sofy Online Documentation,” Sofy Technologies, 1111 W. Long Lake Road, Troy, MI (see http://www.sofy.com/).
5.
Nagel, Roger N., Braithwaite, Walt W., and Kennicott, Philip R., 1980, “Initial Graphics Exchange Specification IGES,” Version 1.0, NBSIR 80-1978, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC. (see http://www.nist.gov/iges/).
6.
Kemmerer, Sharon J., ed., 1999, “STEP, the Grand Experience,” NIST, Special Publication 939, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. (see http://www.steptools.com/).
7.
N. N., 2000, “Parasolid, Functional Description Manual,” Version 12. Unigraphics Solutions, (www.parasolid.com).
8.
Gray
,
Peter M. D.
,
Embury
,
Suzanne M.
,
Hui
,
Kit Y.
, and
Kemp
,
Graham J. L.
1999
, “
The Evolving Role of Constraints in the Functional Data Model
,”
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
,
12
, pp.
113
–
137
.
9.
Mendgen, R., 1998, Methodische Vorgehensweise zur Modellierung in parametrischen und featurebasierten 3D-CAD-Systemen, Shaker-Verlag, Aachen.
10.
Steinbeck, J., 1999, “UG Features & Parameter in PATRAN V8.0,” MSC Demo, MacNeal-Schwendler GmbH, Innsbrucker Ring 15, 81612 Mu¨nchen, Germany.
11.
Anderl, R., and Mendgen, R., 1997, “Analyzing and Optimizing Constraint Structures in Complex Parametric CAD Models,” Proceedings of the Seminar on Geometric Constraint Solving and Applications, Ilmenau.
12.
N. N., 2002, “MSC/PATRAN Online Documentation,” The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 815 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90041.
13.
N. N., 2002, “MSC/Fatigue,” The McNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Los Angeles.
14.
N. N., 2002, “LMS/Falancs User’s Manual,” LMS international, Interleuvenlaan 70, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
15.
N. N., 2002, “MSC/PATRAN Command Language,” The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 815 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90041.
16.
Pareto V., 1886, Cours D’Economie Politique, I+II. F. Rouge, Lausanne.
17.
Tzannetakis, N., Bel Knani, K., and Bologna, P., 2000, “The Use of Parallel DOE, RSM and Non-linear Programming Techniques in Solving Optimization Problems for Automotive Applications,” Proceedings of European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS), Barcelona, Spain, Sept. 11–24.
18.
Tzannetakis, N., Glassee, E., Cartuyvels, R., and Migeot, J.-L., 1998, “The Motivation, Development and Applications of a Commercial Optimization Software Package Using DOE/RSM and NLP methods,” Proc. of DETC98, ASME Design Technical Conference, Sept. 13–16, Atlanta, GA.
19.
Eppler
,
R.
,
2000
, “
Experience with Numerical Fatigue Analysis of Metal Parts in Commercial Vehicles
,”
VDI-Ber.
,
1559
, Numerical Analysis and Simulation in Vehicle Engineering, pp.
439
–
457
.
20.
Merkel
,
M.
, and
Osterhage
,
K.
,
2001
, “
Rig Test Optimization by Fatigue Simulation within the Durability Laboratory,” Measuring and Testing Techniques in the Vehicle Industry
,
VDI-Ber.
,
1616
, pp.
141
–
151
.
21.
N. N., 2002, “MSC/MVISION Material Database,” The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 815 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90041.
22.
Boller, C., and Seeger, T., 1987, Material Data for Cyclic Loading, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
23.
N. N., 2002, “MSC/NASTRAN Online Documentation,” The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 815 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90041.
24.
N. N., 2002, “LMS OPTIMUS Rev 3.1 User’s Manual,” LMS international, Interleuvenlaan 70, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.