Probabilistic design, such as reliability-based design and robust design, offers tools for making reliable decisions with the consideration of uncertainty associated with design variables/parameters and simulation models. Since a probabilistic optimization often involves a double-loop procedure for the overall optimization and iterative probabilistic assessment, the computational demand is extremely high. In this paper, the sequential optimization and reliability assessment (SORA) is developed to improve the efficiency of probabilistic optimization. The SORA method employs a single-loop strategy with a serial of cycles of deterministic optimization and reliability assessment. In each cycle, optimization and reliability assessment are decoupled from each other; the reliability assessment is only conducted after the deterministic optimization to verify constraint feasibility under uncertainty. The key to the proposed method is to shift the boundaries of violated constraints (with low reliability) to the feasible direction based on the reliability information obtained in the previous cycle. The design is quickly improved from cycle to cycle and the computational efficiency is improved significantly. Two engineering applications, the reliability-based design for vehicle crashworthiness of side impact and the integrated reliability and robust design of a speed reducer, are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the SORA method.

1.
Melchers, R. E., 1999, Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
2.
Carter, A. D. S., 1997, Mechanical Reliability and Design, New York, Wiley.
3.
Grandhi
,
R. V.
, and
Wang
,
L. P.
,
1998
, “
Reliability-Based Structural Optimization Using Improved Two-Point Adaptive Nonlinear Approximations
,”
Finite Elem. Anal. Design
,
29
(
1
), pp.
35
48
.
4.
Wu, Y.-T., and Wang, W., 1996, “A New Method for Efficient Reliability-Based Design Optimization,” Probabilistic Mechanics & Structural Reliability: Proceedings of the 7th Special Conference, pp. 274–277.
5.
Taguchi, G., 1993, Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream, ASME Press, New York.
6.
Phadke, M. S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
Sorensen
,
C.
, and
Pourhassan
,
N.
,
1993
, “
A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
(
1
), pp.
74
80
.
8.
Chen
,
W.
,
Allen
,
J. K.
,
Mistree
,
F.
, and
Tsui
,
K.-L.
,
1996
, “
A Procedure for Robust Design: Minimizing Variations Caused by Noise Factors and Control Factors
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
18
(
4
), pp.
478
485
.
9.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2002
, “
Efficient Uncertainty Analysis Methods for Multidisciplinary Robust Design
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
(
3
), pp.
545
552
.
10.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2000
, “
An Integrated Methodology for Uncertainty Propagation and Management in Simulation-Based Systems Design
,”
AIAA J.
,
38
(
8
), pp.
1471
1478
.
11.
Wu
,
Y. T.
,
1994
, “
Computational Methods for Efficient Structural Reliability and Reliability Sensitivity Analysis
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1717
1723
.
12.
Tu
,
J.
,
Choi
,
K. K.
, and
Young
,
H. P.
,
1999
, “
A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
121
(
4
), pp.
557
564
.
13.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2000
, “
Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
357
583
.
14.
Chen, X., and Hasselman, T. K., 1997, “Reliability Based Structural Design Optimization for Practical Applications,” 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit and AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structural Forum, Kissimmee, Florida.
15.
Wu, Y.-T., Shin, Y., Sues, R., and Cesare, M., 2001, “Safety-Factor Based Approach for Probabilistic-based Design Optimization,” 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, Washington.
16.
Sues, R. H., and Cesare, M., 2000, “An Innovative Framework for Reliability-Based MDO,” 41st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC SDM Conference, Atlanta, GA.
17.
Hasofer
,
A. M.
, and
Lind
,
N. C.
,
1974
, “
Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format
,”
J. Eng. Mech. Div.
,
100
(
EM1
), pp.
111
121
.
18.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
, 2001, “A Most Probable Point Based Method for Uncertainty Analysis,” Journal of Design and Manufacturing Automation, 1(1&2), pp. 47–66.
19.
Reddy
,
M. V.
,
Granhdi
,
R. V.
, and
Hopkins
,
D. A.
,
1994
, “
Reliability Based Structural Optimization: A Simplified Safety Index Approach
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
53
(
6
), pp.
1407
1418
.
20.
Wang
,
L.
,
Grandhi
,
R. V.
, and
Hopkins
,
D. A.
,
1995
, “
Structural Reliability Optimization Using An Efficient Safety Index Calculation Procedure
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
38
(
10
), pp.
171
1738
.
21.
Choi, K. K., and Youn, B. D., 2001, “Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization,” 2002 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and the Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
22.
Du, X., Sudjianto, A., and Chen, W., 2003, “An Integrated framework for Optimization under Uncertainty Using Inverse Reliability Strategy,” DETC2003/DAC-48706, 2003 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and the Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
23.
Yang, R. J., Gu, L., Liaw, L., Gearhart, and Tho, C. H., 2000, “Approximations for Safety Optimization of Large Systems,” DETC-2000/DAC-14245, 2000 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and the Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Baltimore, MD.
24.
Gu
,
L.
,
Yang
,
R. J.
,
Tho
,
C. H.
,
Makowski
,
M.
,
Faruque
,
O.
, and
Li
,
Y.
,
2001
, “
Optimization and Robustness for Crashworththiness of Side Impact
,”
Int. J. Veh. Des.
,
25
(
4
), pp.
348
360
.
25.
Golinski
,
J.
,
1970
, “
Optimal Synthesis Problems Solved by Means of Nonlinear Programming and Random Methods
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
5
(
4
), pp.
287
309
.
26.
Golinski
,
J.
,
1973
, “
An Adaptive Optimization System Applied to Machine Synthesis
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
8
(
4
), pp.
419
436
.
27.
Li, W., 1989, “Monoticity and Sensitivity Analysis in Multi-Level Decomposition-Based Design Optimization,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.
28.
Datseris
,
P.
,
1982
, “
Weight Minimization of a Speed Reducer by Heuristic and Decomposition Techniques
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
17
(
4
), pp.
255
262
.
29.
Azarm
,
S.
, and
Li
,
W.-C.
,
1989
, “
Multi-Level Design Optimization Using Global Monotonicity Analysis
,”
ASME J. Mech. Transm., Autom. Des.
,
111
(
2
), pp.
259
263
.
30.
Renaud, J. E., 1993, “Second Order Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Algorithm Development,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division (Publication) DE, Vol. 65, pt. 2, Advances in Design Automation, pp. 347–357.
31.
Boden
,
Harald
, and
Grauer
,
Manfred
,
1995
, “
OpTiX-II: A Software Environment for the Parallel Solution of Nonlinear Optimization Problems
,”
Ann. Operat. Res.
,
58
, pp.
129
140
.
32.
Du, X., and Chen, W., 2002, “Collaborative Reliability Analysis for Multidisciplinary Systems Design,” 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA.
You do not currently have access to this content.