We present a new kinematic calibration algorithm for redundantly actuated parallel mechanisms, and illustrate the algorithm with a case study of a planar seven-element 2-degree-of-freedom (DOF) mechanism with three actuators. To calibrate a nonredundantly actuated parallel mechanism, one can find actual kinematic parameters by means of geometrical constraint of the mechanism’s kinematic structure and measurement values. However, the calibration algorithm for a nonredundant case does not apply for a redundantly actuated parallel mechanism, because the angle error of the actuating joint varies with position and the geometrical constraint fails to be consistent. Such change of joint angle error comes from constraint torque variation with each kinematic pose (meaning position and orientation). To calibrate a redundant parallel mechanism, one therefore has to consider constraint torque equilibrium and the relationship of constraint torque to torsional deflection, in addition to geometric constraint. In this paper, we develop the calibration algorithm for a redundantly actuated parallel mechanism using these three relationships, and formulate cost functions for an optimization algorithm. As a case study, we executed the calibration of a 2-DOF parallel mechanism using the developed algorithm. Coordinate values of tool plate were measured using a laser ball bar and the actual kinematic parameters were identified with a new cost function of the optimization algorithm. Experimental results showed that the accuracy of the tool plate improved by 82% after kinematic calibration in a redundant actuation case.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
redundant manipulators, calibration, optimisation, torsion
Topics:
Calibration, Errors, Kinematics, Parallel mechanisms, Torque, Actuators, Deflection, Optimization
1.
Park
,
F. C.
, and
Kim
,
J. W.
,
1999
, “
Singularity Analysis of Closed Kinematic Chains
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
121
(
1
), pp.
32
–
38
.
2.
Patel, A. J., 1998, “Error Analysis and Accuracy Enhancement of a Hexpod Machine Tool,” Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois.
3.
Hollerbach
,
J. M.
, and
Wampler
,
C. W.
,
1996
, “
The Calibration Index and Taxonomy for Robot Kinematic Calibration Methods
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
15
(
6
), pp.
573
–
591
.
4.
Kosechi, Y., Arai, T., Sugimoto, K., Takatuji, T., and Goto, M., 1998, “Design and Accuracy of High-Speed and High Precision Parallel Mechanism,” IEEE Proc. Int. Conference Robotics and Automation, Leuven, pp. 1340–1345.
5.
Weck, M. and Staimer, D., 2000, “Accuracy Issues of Parallel Kinematic Machine Tools: Compensation and Calibration,” Parallel Kinematic Machines Int. Conf., pp. 35–41.
6.
Bennett
,
D. J.
, and
Hollerbach
,
J. M.
,
1989
, “
Autonomous Calibration of a Single Loop Closed Kinematic Chain formed by Manipulators with Passive Endpoint Constraints
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
7
(
5
), pp.
597
–
605
.
7.
Ota, H., Shibukawa, T., Tooyama, T., and Uchiyama, M., 2000, “Forward Kinematic Calibration Method for Parallel Mechanisms Using Pose Data Measured by a Double Ball Bar System,” Proc. Parallel Kinematic Machines., pp. 57–62.
8.
Ryu, J., and Rauf, A., 2001, “A New Method For Fully Autonomous Calibration of Parallel Manipulators Using Constraint Link,” Proc. IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, July, Vol. 1, pp. 141–146.
9.
Khalil
,
W.
, and
Besnard
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Self-Calibration of Stewart-Gough Parallel Robots Without Extra Sensors
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
15
(
6
), December. pp.
1116
–
1121
.
10.
Jokiel, B., Jr., Bieg, L., and Ziegert, J. C., 2000, “Stewart Platform Calibration Using Sequential Determination of Kinematic Parameters,” Proc. Parallel Kinematic Machines, pp. 50–56.
11.
Wampler
,
C. W.
,
Hollerbach
,
J. M.
, and
Arai
,
T.
,
1995
, “
An Implicit Loop Method for Kinematic Calibration and its Application to Closed Chain Mechanisms
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
11
(
5
), pp.
710
–
724
.
12.
Iurascu
,
C. C.
, and
Park
,
F. C.
,
2003
, “
Kinematic Calibration of Robots Containing Closed Loops
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
125
(
1
), pp.
23
–
32
.
13.
Zhuang
,
H.
,
1995
, “
Self-Calibration of Parallel Mechanisms with a Case Study on Stewart Platforms
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
387
–
397
.
14.
Zhuang, H., and Liu, L., 1996, “Self-Calibration of a Class of Parallel Manipulators,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conference Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 994–999.
15.
Kumar
,
V.
, and
Gardner
,
J. F.
,
1990
, “
Kinematics of Redundantly Actuated Closed Chains
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
269
–
274
.
16.
Luecke
,
G. R.
, and
Lai
,
K. W.
,
1997
, “
A Joint Error-Feedback Approach to Internal Force Regulation in Cooperating Manipulator Systems
,”
J. Rob. Syst.
,
14
(
9
), pp.
631
–
648
.
17.
Ryu, S., 2001, “Joint Torque Distribution for Redundantly Actuated Parallel Mechanisms,” School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Ph.D. Thesis.
18.
Kim
,
J.
,
Park
,
F. C.
,
Ryu
,
S. J.
,
Kim
,
J.
,
Hwang
,
J.
,
Park
,
C.
, and
Iurascu
,
C.
,
2001
, “
Design and Analysis of a Redundantly Actuated Parallel Mechanism for Rapid Machining
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
17
(
4
), pp.
423
–
434
.
19.
Gosselin
,
C. M.
,
1996
, “
Kinematische und Statische Analyze eines Ebenen Parallelen Manipulators mit dem Freiheitsgrad Zwei
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
31
(
2
), pp.
149
–
160
.
20.
Kircanski
,
N. M.
, and
Goldenberg
,
A. A.
,
1997
, “
An Experimental Study of Nonlinear Stiffness, Hysteresis, and Friction Effects in Robot with Harmonic Drives and Torque Sensors
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
,
16
(
2
), pp.
214
–
239
.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.