Assessing performance in developing new aerospace products is essential. However, choosing an accurate set of success indicators to measure the performance of complex products is a nontrivial task. Moreover, the most useful success indicators can change over the life of the product; therefore, different metrics need to be used at different phases of the product lifecycle (PLC). This paper describes the research undertaken to determine success measurement metrics for new product development (NPD) processes. The goal of this research was to ascertain an appropriate set of metrics used by aerospace companies for assessing success during different phases of the PLC. Furthermore, an evaluation of the differences and similarities of NPD success measurement was carried out between aerospace companies and the nonaerospace companies practicing in the business-to-business (B2B) market. Practical case studies were carried out for 16 Canadian and Danish companies. Seven companies belong to the aerospace sector, while nine are nonaerospace companies that are in the B2B market. The data were gathered from relevant product managers at participating companies. The outcomes of this research indicate that: (1) the measurement of success of aerospace NPD practices depends on the PLC phase being measured, (2) product and process management performance are the more important indicators of success in the early PLC phases with revenue and market share indicators being important during late phases, and (3) there are reasonable similarities in success measurement between aerospace and nonaerospace B2B companies. Sets of metrics for measuring success during each PLC phase of aerospace products are proposed, which can guide companies in determining their ideal practices.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Keywords:
aerospace industry, product life cycle management, new product development (NPD), aerospace industry, business to business (B2B), success metrics, product lifecycle (PLC)
Topics:
Aerospace industry, Dimensions, Product development

References

1.
Calantone
,
R.
,
Chan
,
K.
, and
Cui
,
A. S.
, 2006, “
Decomposing Product Innovativeness and Its Effects on New Product Success
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
23
(
5
), pp.
408
–
421
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
Avlonitis
,
G. J.
,
Papastahopoulou
,
P. G.
, and
Gounaris
,
S. P.
, 2001, “
An Empirically-Based Typology of Product Innovativeness for New Financial Services: Success and Failure Scenarios
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
18
, pp.
324
–
342
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
Talke
,
K.
,
Salomo
,
S.
,
Wieringa
,
E. J.
, and
Lutz
,
A.
, 2009, “
What About Design Newness? Investigating the Relevance of a Neglected Dimension of Product Innovativeness
,”
J. Prod. Dev. Manage.
,
26
, pp.
601
–
615
.
4.
Graber
,
D. R.
, 1996,
How to Manage a Global Product Development Process?
Ind. Mark. Manage.
,
25
(
6
), pp.
483
–
489
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
Zou
,
S.
, and
Ozsomer
,
A.
, 1999, “
Global Product R&D and the Firm’s Strategic Position
,”
J. Int. Mark.
,
7
(
1
), pp.
57
–
76
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
De Brentani
,
U.
,
Kleinschmidt
,
E. J.
, and
Salomo
S.
, 2010, “
Success in Global New Product Development: Impact of Strategy and the Behavioural Environment of the Firm
,”
J. Prod. Dev. Manage.
,
27
, pp.
143
–
160
.
7.
Clark
,
K. B.
, and
Fujimoto
,
T.
, 1992,
Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry
,
Harvard Business School Press
,
Boston, MA
.
8.
Huang
,
X.
,
Soutar
,
G. N.
,
Brown
,
A.
, 2004, “
Measuring New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of Australian SMEs
,”
Ind. Mark. Manage.
,
33
(
2
), pp.
117
–
123
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
9.
Cooper
,
R. G.
, 1979, “
Identifying Industrial New Product Success: Project NewProd
,”
J. Ind. Mark. Manage.
,
8
(
2
), pp.
124
–
135
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
Kleinschmidt
,
E. J.
, and
Cooper
,
R. G.
, 1993, “
Major New Products: What Distinguishes the Winners in the Chemical Industry?
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
90
–
111
.
11.
Maidique
,
M. A.
, 1984, “
A Study of Success and Failure in Product Innovation: the Case of the US Electronics Industry
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
,
31
(
4
), pp.
192
–
203
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
Craig
,
A.
, 1992, “
Where to Now in New Product Development Research?
,”
Eur. J. Market.
,
26
(
11
), pp.
3
–
49
.
13.
Griffin
,
A.
, and
Page
,
A. L.
, 1996, “
PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
13
(
6
), pp.
478
–
496
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
14.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Azarm
,
S.
, and
Kannan
,
P. K.
, 2011, “
Strategic Design Decisions for Uncertain Market Systems Using an Agent Based Approach
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
133
(
4
), pp.
1
–
11
.
15.
Glas
,
M.
, and
Ziemer
,
S.
, 2009, “
Challenges for Agile Development of Large Systems in the Aviation Industry
,”
Proceeding of the 24th ACM SIGPLAN Conference Companion on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications
, pp.
901
–
908
16.
Ernst
,
H.
, 2002, “
Success Factors of New Product Development: a Review of the Empirical Literature
,”
Int. J. Manage. Rev.
,
4
(
1
), pp.
1
–
40
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
Lipovetsky
,
S.
, 1997, “
The Relative Importance of Project Success Dimensions
,”
J. R & D Manage.
,
27
(
2
), pp.
97
–
106
.
18.
Griffin
,
A.
, 1993, “
An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
291
–
308
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
19.
Cooper
,
R. G.
, and
Kleinschmidt
,
E. J.
, 1987, “
Success Factors in Product Innovation
,”
J. Ind. Mark. Manage.
,
16
, pp.
215
–
223
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
20.
Hauschildt
,
J.
, 1991, “
Towards Measuring the Success of Innovations
,”
Proceeding of the Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology
,Portland, OR, pp.
605
–
608
.
21.
Hart
,
S.
, 1993, “
Dimensions of Success in New Product Development: An Exploratory Investigation
,”
J. Market. Manage.
,
9
, pp.
23
–
41
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
22.
Page
,
A. L.
, 1993, “
Assessing New Product Development Practices and Performance: Establishing Crucial Norms
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
273
–
290
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
23.
Hultink
,
E. J.
, and
Robben
,
H. S. J.
, 1995, “
Measuring New Product Success: The Difference that Time Perspective Makes
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
12
(
5
), pp.
392
–
405
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
24.
Haque
,
B.
, and
Moore
,
M. J.
, 2004, “
Measures of Performance for Lean Product Introduction in the Aerospace Industry
,”
J. Eng. Manuf.
,
218
(
B
), pp.
1387
–
1398
.
25.
Jones
,
M.
,
Ward
,
Y.
, and
Graves
,
A.
, 2001, “
A Common Set of Metrics for Improved Competitiveness in Aerospace
,”
Inte. J. Aerosp. Manage.
,
1
(
2
), pp.
131
–
137
.
26.
Vernon
,
R.
, 1966, “
International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle
,”
Q. J. Econ.
,
80
(
2
), pp.
190
–
207
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
27.
SME Financing Data Initiative 2008, “SME Financing Data Initiative—Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Financing in Canada—Glossary of Terms,” Available at: http://www.sme-fdi.gc.ca/eic/site/sme_fdi-prf_pme.nsf/eng/01068.htmlhttp://www.sme-fdi.gc.ca/eic/site/sme_fdi-prf_pme.nsf/eng/01068.html, accessed 10/3/2010.
28.
Saaksvuori
,
A.
, 2008,
Product Lifecycle Management
, 3rd ed.,
Springer
,
New York
, p.
253
.
29.
Yin
,
R. K.
, 2003,
Case Study Research, Design and Methods
,
Sage Publications
,
London
, p.
171
.
30.
Siegle
,
D.
, 2009, “
Critical Values of the Correlation Coefficient
,” Available at: http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/correlation/corrchrt.htmhttp://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/correlation/corrchrt.htm, accessed 10/6/2010.
31.
Colorado State University
, 2011, “
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Survey Method
,” Available at: http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/survey/com2d1.cfmhttp://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/survey/com2d1.cfm, accessed 10/6/2010.
Copyright © 2011
 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.