Many new products fail upon introduction to the marketplace, but a few products are exceptionally successful, earning innovation awards and other benchmarks of success. To better understand the features of those innovative products, 197 award-winning products are analyzed to identify the characteristics that distinguish those products from the competition. For the analysis, a set of product-level characteristics is identified and organized into categories, which include functionality, architecture, external interactions, user interactions, and cost. Based on their innovation award citations, the products are analyzed with respect to the set of characteristics, and results are tabulated. Several award-winning products are also compared with competitive products on the shelves of major retail stores. On average, award-winning products display multiple characteristics of innovation. Overall, a vast majority (more than two-thirds) of the award-winning products exhibit enhanced user interactions, with a similar percentage displaying enhanced external interactions, compared with approximately one-third of products offering an additional function and approximately half displaying innovative architectures. The award-winning products also exhibit an average of approximately two more characteristics than their competitors on retail shelves, along with significantly higher rates of innovative architecture, external interactions, and user interactions. The analysis concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for engineering design methods.

1.
Cooper
,
R.
, 2005,
Product Leadership
,
Basic Books
,
New York
.
2.
1984,
Association of National Advertisers
,
Prescription for New Product Success
,
New York
.
3.
Lori
,
D.
, 2002, “
Learning From Failure: Knowing What Went Wrong in Past Product Launches Can Be Key to Future Success
,”
Stagnito’s New Products Magazine
,
2
(
3
), p.
18
.
4.
Berkowitz
,
D.
,
Wren
,
B.
, and
Grant
,
S.
, 2007, “
Predicting New Product Success or Failure: A Comparison of U.S. and U.K. Practices (Report)
,”
Journal of Comparative International Management
,
10
, pp.
50
65
.
5.
Kano
,
N.
, 1984, “
Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality
,”
The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control
, (April), pp.
39
48
.
6.
Cooper
,
R.
, 1979, “
The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure
,”
J. Mark.
,
43
(
3
), pp.
93
103
.
7.
Cooper
,
R.
, and
de Brentani
,
U.
, 1991, “
New Industrial Financial Services: What Distinguishes the Winners
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
8
(
2
), pp.
75
90
.
8.
Kleinschmidt
,
E.
, and
Cooper
,
R.
, 1991, “
The Impact of Product Innovation on Performance
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
8
(
4
), pp.
240
251
.
9.
Parry
,
M.
, and
Song
,
X.
, 1994, “
Identifying New Product Successes in China
,”
Journal of Product Innovation Management
,
11
(
1
), pp.
15
30
.
10.
Song
,
X.
, and
Parry
,
M.
, 1994, “
The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure in State Enterprises in the People’s Republic of China
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
11
(
2
), pp.
105
118
.
11.
Ali
,
A.
,
Krapfel
,
R.
, and
LaBahn
,
D.
, 1995, “
Product Innovativeness and Entry Strategy: Impact on Cycle Time and Break-Even Time
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
12
(
1
), pp.
54
69
.
12.
Lynn
,
G.
,
Morone
,
J.
, and
Paulson
,
A.
, 1996, “
Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process
,”
California Manage. Rev.
0008-1256,
38
(
3
), pp.
8
37
.
13.
Goldenberg
,
J.
,
Lehmann
,
D.
, and
Mazursky
,
D.
, 1999, “
The Primacy of the Idea Itself as a Predictor of New Product Success
,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper.
14.
Astebro
,
T.
, and
Michela
,
J.
, 2005, “
Predictors of the Survival of Innovations
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
22
(
4
), pp.
322
335
.
15.
Mishra
,
S.
,
Kim
,
D.
, and
Lee
,
D.
, 1996, “
Factors Affecting New Product Success: Cross Country Comparisons
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
13
(
6
), pp.
530
550
.
16.
Souder
,
W.
, and
Song
,
M.
, 1997, “
Contingent Product Design, and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success, and Failure in US, and Japanese Electronic Firms
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
14
(
1
), pp.
21
34
.
17.
von Hippel
,
E.
, 1986, “
Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts
,”
Manage. Sci.
0025-1909,
32
(
7
), pp.
791
805
.
18.
Deszca
,
G.
,
Munro
,
H.
, and
Noori
,
H.
, 1999, “
Developing Breakthrough Products: Challenges and Options for Market Assessment
,”
J. Operations Manage.
0272-6963,
17
(
6
), pp.
613
630
.
19.
Colarelli O’Connor
,
G.
, 1998, “
Market Learning and Radical Innovation: A Cross Case Comparison of Eight Radical Innovation Projects
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
15
(
2
), pp.
151
166
.
20.
Song
,
X.
, and
Parry
,
M.
, 1999, “
Challenges of Managing the Development of Breakthrough Products in Japan
,”
J. Operations Manage.
0272-6963,
17
(
6
), pp.
665
688
.
21.
Hauser
,
J.
, and
Clausing
,
D.
, 1988, “
The House of Quality
,”
Harvard Bus. Rev.
0017-8012,
66
(
3
), pp.
63
73
.
22.
Williams
,
N.
,
Azarm
,
S.
, and
Kannan
,
P.
, 2008, “
Engineering Product Design Optimization for Retail Channel Acceptance
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
(
6
), p.
061402
.
23.
Michalek
,
J.
,
Ceryan
,
O.
,
Papalambros
,
P.
, and
Koren
,
Y.
, 2006, “
Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design
,”
ASME. Mech. Des.
,
128
(
6
), pp.
1196
1204
.
24.
Olshavsky
,
R.
, and
Sprend
,
R.
, 1996, “
An Exploratory Study of the Innovation Evaluation Process
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
13
(
6
), pp.
512
529
.
25.
Veryzer
,
R.
, 1998, “
Key Factors Affecting Customer Evaluation of Discontinuous New Products
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
15
(
2
), pp.
136
150
.
26.
Crilly
,
N.
,
Moultrie
,
J.
, and
Clarkson
,
P.
, 2009, “
Shaping Things: Intended Consumer Response and the Other Determinants of Product Form
,”
Des. Stud.
0142-694X,
30
(
3
), pp.
224
254
.
27.
Lawton
,
L.
, and
Parasuraman
,
A.
, 1980, “
The Impact of the Marketing Concept on New Product Planning
,”
J. Mark.
,
44
(
1
), pp.
19
25
.
28.
More
,
R.
, 1982, “
Risk Factors in Accepted and Rejected New Industrial Products
,”
Ind. Mark. Manage.
0019-8501,
11
, pp.
9
15
.
29.
Lee
,
M.
, and
Na
,
D.
, 1994, “
Determinants of Technical Success in Product Development When Innovative Radicalness Is Considered
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
11
(
1
), pp.
62
68
.
30.
Olson
,
E.
,
Walker
,
O.
, and
Ruekert
,
R.
, 1995, “
Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness
,”
J. Mark.
,
59
(
1
), pp.
48
62
.
31.
Schmidt
,
J.
, and
Calantone
,
R.
, 1998, “
Are Really New Product Development Projects Harder to Shut Down?
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
15
(
2
), pp.
111
123
.
32.
Song
,
M.
, and
Montoya-Weiss
,
M.
, 1998, “
Critical Development Activities for Really New Versus Incremental Products
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
15
(
2
), pp.
124
135
.
33.
Garcia
,
R.
, and
Calantone
,
R.
, 2002, “
A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
0737-6782,
19
(
2
), pp.
110
132
.
34.
Foster
,
R.
, 1986,
Innovation, the Attacker’s Advantage
,
Summit
,
New York
.
35.
Betz
,
F.
, 1993,
Strategic Technology Management
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
36.
Dewar
,
R.
, and
Dutton
,
J.
, 1986, “
The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis
,”
Manage. Sci.
0025-1909,
32
(
11
), pp.
1422
1433
.
37.
Franke
,
H.
, 1975, “
Methodische Schritte beim Klaren konstruktiver Aufgabenstellugen
,”
Konstruktion
,
27
, pp.
395
402
.
38.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
, 1996,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.
39.
Otto
,
K.
, and
Wood
,
K.
, 2001,
Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering: Systematic Design, and New Product Development
,
Prentice-Hall
,
New York
.
40.
Rohrbach
,
B.
, 1969, “
Kreativ Nach Regeln–Methode 635, Eine Neue Technik Zum Losen Von Problemen
,”
Absatzwirtschaft
,
12
, pp.
73
75
.
41.
Shah
,
J.
, 1998, “
Experimental Investigation of Progressive Idea Generation Techniques in Engineering Design
,”
ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference
, Atlanta, GA.
42.
Altshuller
,
G. S.
, 1984,
Creativity as an Exact Science
,
Gordon and Breach
,
Luxembourg
.
43.
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Murphy
,
J. T.
,
Markman
,
A. B.
,
Wood
,
K. L.
, and
Kurtoglu
,
T.
, 2006, “
Representing Analogies: Increasing the Probability of Innovation
,”
ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference
, Philadelphia, PA, Paper No. DETC2006-99383.
44.
Singh
,
V.
,
Skiles
,
S.
,
Krager
,
J.
,
Wood
,
K.
,
Jensen
,
D.
, and
Sierakowski
,
R.
, 2009, “
Innovations in Design Through Transformation: A Fundamental Study of Transformation Principles
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
8
), p.
081010
.
45.
Chiu
,
I.
, and
Shu
,
L. H.
, 2007, “
Biomimetic Design Through Natural Language Analysis to Facilitate Cross-Domain Information Retrieval
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
0890-0604,
21
(
1
), pp.
45
59
.
46.
Keeney
,
R.
, and
Raiffa
,
H.
, 1976,
Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
47.
Saaty
,
T.
, 1980,
The Analytical Hierarchy Process
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
48.
Pugh
,
S.
, 1990,
Total Design
,
Addison-Wesley
,
New York
.
49.
Thevenot
,
H.
, and
Simpson
,
T.
, 2009, “
A Product Dissection-Based Methodology to Benchmark Product Family Design Alternatives
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
4
), p.
041002
.
50.
Leary
,
M.
, and
Burvil
,
C.
, 2007, “
Enhancing the Quality Function Deployment Conceptual Design Tool
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
129
(
7
), pp.
701
708
.
51.
Ulrich
,
K.
, 1995, “
The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm
,”
Res. Policy
0048-7333,
24
(
3
), pp.
419
440
.
52.
Stone
,
R. B.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
, 2000, “
Development of a Functional Basis for Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
122
, pp.
359
370
.
53.
Industrial Design Society of America
, 2008, International Design Excellence Awards, Vicks forehead thermometer.
54.
2006, Popular Science, Best of What’s New, Recreation: Nike+iPod Sports Kit.
55.
2007, Popular Science, Best of What’s New, Home Tech: Oliso Frisper.
56.
Tinsley
,
H.
, and
Weiss
,
D.
, 2000, “
Interrater Reliability and Agreement
,”
Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling
,
Academic
,
New York
, pp.
95
124
.
57.
Cohen
,
J.
, 1960, “
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
,”
Educ. Psychol. Meas.
0013-1644,
20
(
1
), pp.
37
46
.
58.
Landis
,
J.
, and
Koch
,
G.
, 1977, “
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
,”
Biometrics
0006-341X,
33
(
1
), pp.
159
174
.
59.
Fleiss
,
J.
, 1981,
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
60.
von Hippel
,
E.
, 2005,
Democratizing Innovation
,
MIT
,
Cambridge, MA
.
61.
Lettl
,
C.
, 2007, “
User Involvement Competence for Radical Innovation
,”
J. Eng. Technol. Manage.
0923-4748,
24
(
1–2
), pp.
53
75
.
62.
Hannukainen
,
P.
, and
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
, 2006, “
Identifying Customer Needs—Disabled Persons as Lead Users
,”
ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference
, Las Vegas, NV,
ASME
,
New York
, Paper No. DETC2006-99043.
63.
Lin
,
J.
, and
Seepersad
,
C.
, 2007, “
Empathic Lead Users: The Effects of Extraordinary User Experiences on Customer Needs Analysis and Product Redesign
,”
ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference
, Las Vegas, NV,
ASME
,
New York
, Paper No. DETC2007-35302.
64.
Leonard
,
D.
, and
Rayport
,
J.
, 1997, “
Sparking Innovation Through Empathic Design
,”
Harvard Bus. Rev.
0017-8012,
75
(
6
), pp.
102
113
.
65.
Kelley
,
T.
, 2001,
The Art of Innovation
,
Doubleday
,
New York, NY
.
66.
Green
,
M. G.
,
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
Seepersad
,
C. C.
, and
Wood
,
K. L.
, 2006, “
Frontier Design: A Product Usage Context Method
,”
ASME IDETC/CIE Design Theory and Methodology Conference
, Philadelphia, PA, Paper No. DETC2006-99608.
67.
The Center for Universal Design
, 2002,
Ford Drives a Mile in an Older Person’s Suit
,
North Carolina State University
,
Raleigh, NC
.
68.
Story
,
M.
,
Mueller
,
J.
, and
Mace
,
R.
, 1998,
The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages & Abilities
,
Center for Universal Design, NC State University
,
Raleigh, NC
.
69.
Preiser
,
W.
, and
Ostroff
,
E.
, 2001,
Universal Design Handbook
,
McGraw-Hill Professional
,
New York
.
70.
Redström
,
J.
, 2006, “
Towards User Design? On the Shift From Object to User as the Subject of Design
,”
Des. Stud.
0142-694X,
27
(
2
), pp.
123
139
.
71.
Cagan
,
J.
, and
Vogel
,
C. M.
, 2002,
Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation From Product Planning to Program Approval
,
Pearson Education, Inc.
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
.
You do not currently have access to this content.