Abstract
The study explored ways in which briefs can be structured to support creative design outcomes. The procedure involved a controlled, yet analytical experiment carried out in a university setting to test the use of analogical reasoning under different conditions to enhance the creativity of design solutions. The first goal was to verify whether visual and text analogies contribute to enhancing design creativity, measured by novel and useful solutions. The second goal was to explore the use of visual and text analogies in creative designs when instructions to formulate negative statements about the problem were provided. A final goal was to test whether correlations exist between the students’ self-reported creativity and their design outcomes scores. 179 first-year undergraduate students participated in this study. The results showed that design briefs with specific instructions to use text or visual analogies yielded highly novel outcomes. However, when text or visual analogies were triggered by statements concerning negative issues of the design problem, more useful outcomes were produced. Moreover, significant relationships were found between self-perceived creativity and the novelty of the outcomes generated in the visual and text analogy briefs. It is suggested that both types of analogies should be employed as effective design studio pedagogical tools to enhance creativity. Negative statements should be considered when the design goal is to improve existing features of current solutions.
References
1.
Liikkanen
, L. A.
, and Perttula
, M.
, 2008
, “Inspiring Design Idea Generation: Insights From a Memory-Search Perspective
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 21
(5
), pp. 545
–560
. 2.
Casakin
, H.
, and Kreitler
, S.
, 2008
, “Correspondences and Divergences Between Teachers and Students in the Evaluation of Design Creativity in the Design Studio
,” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des.
, 35
(4
), pp. 666
–678
. 3.
Sarkar
, P.
, and Chakrabarti
, A.
, 2008
, “The Effect of Representation of Triggers on Design Outcomes
,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
, 22
(2
), pp. 101
–116
. 4.
Vasconcelos
, L. A.
, and Crilly
, N.
, 2016
, “Inspiration and Fixation: Questions, Methods, Findings, and Challenges
,” Des. Stud.
, 42
, pp. 1
–32
. 5.
Koronis
, G.
, Chia
, P. Z.
, Kang
, J. K. S.
, Silva
, A.
, Yogiaman
, C.
, and Raghunath
, N.
, 2019
, “An Empirical Study on the Impact of Design Brief Information on the Creativity of Design Outcomes With Consideration of Gender, and Gender Diversity
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 141
(7
), p. 071102
. 6.
Meurzec
, R. W.
, Koh
, B.
, Koronis
, G.
, Kang
, J. K. S.
, Yogiaman
, C.
, and Silva
, A.
, 2019
, “Assessing Regulatory Focus Differences in Creative Ideation: An Examination of Prevention and Promotion Mindsets on Novelty and Usefulness
,” Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design
, Delft, The Netherlands
, Aug. 5–8
, pp. 49
–58
.7.
Goel
, A. K.
, 1997
, “Design, Analogy, and Creativity
,” IEEE Expert
, 12
(3
), pp. 62
–70
. 8.
Feng
, T.
, Cheong
, H.
, and Shu
, L. H.
, 2014
, “Effects of Abstraction on Selecting Relevant Biological Phenomena for Biomimetic Design
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 136
(11
), p. 111111
. 9.
Vasconcelos
, L. A.
, Cardoso
, C. C.
, Sääksjärvi
, M.
, Chen
, C.-C.
, and Crilly
, N.
, 2017
, “Inspiration and Fixation: The Influences of Example Designs and System Properties in Idea Generation
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 139
(3
), p. 031101
. 10.
Chan
, J.
, Fu
, K.
, Schunn
, C.
, Cagan
, J.
, Wood
, K.
, and Kotovsky
, K.
, 2011
, “On the Benefits and Pitfalls of Analogies for Innovative Design: Ideation Performance Based on Analogical Distance, Commonness, and Modality of Examples
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 133
(8
), p. 081004
. 11.
Toh
, C. A.
, and Miller
, S. R.
, 2014
, “The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 136
(9
), p. 091004
. 12.
Casakin
, H.
, and Goldschmidt
, G.
, 1999
, “Expertise and the Use of Visual Analogy: Implications for Design Education
,” Des. Stud.
, 20
(2
), pp. 153
–175
. 13.
Kwon
, E.
, Pehlken
, A.
, Thoben
, K.-D.
, Bazylak
, A.
, and Shu
, L. H.
, 2019
, “Visual Similarity to Aid Alternative-Use Concept Generation for Retired Wind-Turbine Blades
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 141
(3
), p. 031106
. 14.
Goldschmidt
, G.
, and Sever
, A. L.
, 2011
, “Inspiring Design Ideas With Texts
,” Des. Stud.
, 32
(2
), pp. 139
–155
. 15.
Shah
, J. J.
, Smith
, S. M.
, and Vargas-Hernandez
, N.
, 2003
, “Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness
,” Des. Stud.
, 24
(2
), pp. 111
–134
. 16.
Dean
, D. M.
, Hender
, J.
, Lee Rodgers
, T.
, and Santanen
, E.
, 2006
, “Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation
,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst.
, 7
(10
), pp. 646
–699
. 17.
Kampylis
, P. G.
, and Valtanen
, J.
, 2010
, “Redefining Creativity—Analyzing Definitions, Collocations, and Consequences
,” J. Creat. Behav.
, 44
(3
), pp. 191
–214
. 18.
Runco
, M. A.
, and Jaeger
, G. J.
, 2012
, “The Standard Definition of Creativity
,” Creat. Res. J.
, 24
(1
), pp. 92
–96
. 19.
Bourgeois-Bougrine
, S.
, Buisine
, S.
, Vandendriessche
, C.
, Glaveanu
, V.
, and Lubart
, T.
, 2017
, “Engineering Students’ Use of Creativity and Development Tools in Conceptual Product Design: What, When and How?
,” Think. Skills Creat.
, 24
, pp. 104
–117
. 20.
Amabile
, T. M.
, 2018
, Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity
, Routledge
, New York
, p. 336
.21.
Schön
, D. A.
, 1988
, “Designing: Rules, Types and Worlds
,” Des. Stud.
, 9
(3
), pp. 181
–190
. 22.
Ryd
, N.
, 2004
, “The Design Brief as Carrier of Client Information During the Construction Process
,” Des. Stud.
, 25
(3
), pp. 231
–249
. 23.
Van Gorp
, A.
, and Van De Poel
, I.
, 2001
, “Ethical Considerations in Engineering Design Processes
,” IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag.
, 20
(3
), pp. 15
–22
. 24.
Lawson
, R. B.
, 2006
, How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified
, Butterworth Architecture
, Jordan Hill, Oxford
, p. 320
.25.
Paton
, B.
, and Dorst
, K.
, 2011
, “Briefing and Reframing: A Situated Practice
,” Des. Stud.
, 32
(6
), pp. 573
–587
. 26.
Koronis
, G.
, Silva
, A.
, Kang
, J. K. S.
, and Yogiaman
, C.
, 2020
, “How to Best Frame a Design Brief to Maximize Novelty and Usefulness in Idea Generation
,” Proceedings of the Design Society: Design Conference
, Croatia
, Oct. 26–29
, Vol. 1, pp. 1745
–1754
.27.
Sawyer
, R. K.
, 2017
, “Teaching Creativity in Art and Design Studio Classes: A Systematic Literature Review
,” Educ. Res. Rev.
, 22
, pp. 99
–113
. 28.
Rönkkö
, M. L.
, Mommo
, S.
, and Aerila
, J. A.
, 2016
, “The Teachers’ Views on the Significance of the Design and Craft Teaching in Finland
,” Des. Technol. Educ.
, 21
(2
), pp. 49
–58
.29.
Fu
, K.
, Cagan
, J.
, and Kotovsky
, K.
, 2010
, “Design Team Convergence: The Influence of Example Solution Quality
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 132
(11
), p. 111005
. 30.
Cardoso
, C.
, and Badke-Schaub
, P.
, 2011
, “Fixation or Inspiration: Creative Problem Solving in Design
,” J. Creat. Behav.
, 45
(2
), pp. 77
–82
. 31.
Getzels
, J. W.
, 1975
, “Problem-Finding and the Inventiveness of Solutions
,” J. Creat. Behav.
, 9
(1
), pp. 12
–18
. 32.
Casakin
, H.
, 2010
, “Visual Analogy, Visual Displays, and the Nature of Design Problems: The Effect of Expertise
,” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des.
, 37
(1
), pp. 170
–188
. 33.
Crilly
, N.
, 2019
, “Creativity and Fixation in the Real World: A Literature Review of Case Study Research
,” Des. Stud.
, 64
, pp. 154
–168
. 34.
Dell'Era
, C.
, Buganza
, T.
, Fecchio
, C.
, and Verganti
, R.
, 2011
, “Language Brokering: Stimulating Creativity During the Concept Development Phase
,” Creat. Innov. Manage.
, 20
(1
), pp. 36
–48
. 35.
Chen
, W.
, 2016
, “Exploring the Learning Problems and Resource Usage of Undergraduate Industrial Design Students in Design Studio Courses
,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ.
, 26
(3
), pp. 461
–487
. 36.
Toh
, C. A.
, and Miller
, S. R.
, 2015
, “How Engineering Teams Select Design Concepts: A View Through the Lens of Creativity
,” Des. Stud.
, 38
, pp. 111
–138
. 37.
Phillips
, P. L.
, 2004
, Creating the Perfect Design Brief—How to Manage Design for Strategic Advantage
, Allworth Press
, New York
, p. 240
.38.
Simon
, H. A.
, 1984
, The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems
, N.
Cross
, ed., John Wiley & Sons
, Avon, UK
.39.
Cross
, N.
, 2011
, Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work
, Bloomsbury Publishing
, UK
, p. 192
.40.
Rittel
, H. W. J.
, and Webber
, M. M.
, 1973
, “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning
,” Policy Sci.
, 4
(2
), pp. 155
–169
. 41.
Vande Zande
, R.
, Warnock
, L.
, Nikoomanesh
, B.
, and Van Dexter
, K.
, 2014
, “The Design Process in the Art Classroom: Building Problem-Solving Skills for Life and Careers
,” Art Educ.
, 67
(6
), pp. 20
–27
. 42.
Schön
, D. A.
, 1983
, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
, Routledge
, New York
, p. 384
.43.
Plous
, S.
, 1993
, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making
, McGraw-Hill
, New York
, p. 302
.44.
Studer
, J. A.
, Daly
, S. R.
, McKilligan
, S.
, and Seifert
, C. M.
, 2018
, “Evidence of Problem Exploration in Creative Designs
,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
, 32
(4
), pp. 415
–430
. 45.
Sio
, U. N.
, Kotovsky
, K.
, and Cagan
, J.
, 2015
, “Fixation or Inspiration? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Role of Examples on Design Processes
,” Des. Stud.
, 39
, pp. 70
–99
. 46.
Koronis
, G.
, Chia
, P. Z.
, Kang Kai Siang
, J.
, Silva
, A.
, Yogiaman
, C.
, and Raghunath
, N.
, 2019
, “An Empirical Study on the Impact of Design Brief Information on the Creativity of Design Outcomes With Consideration of Gender and Gender Diversity
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 141
(7
), p. 071102
. 47.
Koronis
, G.
, Casakin
, H.
, and Silva
, A.
, 2021
, “Crafting Briefs to Stimulate Creativity in the Design Studio
,” Think. Skills Creat.
, 40
, p. 100810
. 48.
Koronis
, G.
, Silva
, A.
, Kang Kai Siang
, J.
, and Yogiaman
, C.
, 2022
, “A Study on the Link Between Design Brief Structure and Stimulus Fidelity to Optimize Novelty and Usefulness
,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
, 36
, p. e5
. 49.
Dodds
, R. A.
, Smith
, S. M.
, and Ward
, T. B.
, 2002
, “The Use of Environmental Clues During Incubation
,” Creat. Res. J.
, 14
(3–4
), pp. 287
–304
. 50.
Gentner
, D.
, and Markman
, A. B.
, 1997
, “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity
,” Am. Psychol.
, 52
(1
), pp. 45
–56
. 51.
Dunbar
, K.
, and Blanchette
, I.
, 2001
, “The In Vivo/In Vitro Approach to Cognition: The Case of Analogy
,” Trends Cogn. Sci.
, 5
(8
), pp. 334
–339
. 52.
Markman
, A.
, Wood
, K.
, Linsey
, J.
, Murphy
, J.
, and Laux
, J.
, 2009
, “Supporting Innovation by Promoting Analogical Reasoning,” Tools for Innovation
, A.
Markman
, and K.
Wood
, eds., Oxford University Press
, New York
, pp. 85
–103
.53.
Goldschmidt
, G.
, and Smolkov
, M.
, 2006
, “Variances in the Impact of Visual Stimuli on Design Problem Solving Performance
,” Des. Stud.
, 27
(5
), pp. 549
–569
. 54.
Ozkan
, O.
, and Dogan
, F.
, 2013
, “Cognitive Strategies of Analogical Reasoning in Design: Differences Between Expert and Novice Designers
,” Des. Stud.
, 34
(2
), pp. 161
–192
. 55.
Casakin
, H. P.
, and Goldschmidt
, G.
, 2000
, “Reasoning by Visual Analogy in Design Problem-Solving: The Role of Guidance
,” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des.
, 27
(1
), pp. 105
–119
. 56.
Casakin
, H.
, 2004
, “Visual Analogy as a Cognitive Strategy in the Design Process. Expert Versus Novice Performance
,” J. Des. Res.
, 4
(2
), pp. 197
–217
. 57.
Cai
, H.
, Do
, E.
, and Zimring
, C.
, 2010
, “Extended Linkography and Distance Graph in Design Evaluation: An Empirical Study of the Dual Effects of Inspiration Sources in Creative Design
,” Des. Stud.
, 31
(2
), pp. 146
–168
. 58.
Perttula
, M.
, and Sipilä
, P.
, 2007
, “The Idea Exposure Paradigm in Design Idea Generation
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 18
(1
), pp. 93
–102
. 59.
Ball
, L. J.
, Ormerod
, T. C.
, and Morley
, N. J.
, 2004
, “Spontaneous Analogising in Engineering Design: A Comparative Analysis of Experts and Novices
,” Des. Stud.
, 25
(5
), pp. 495
–508
. 60.
Moreno
, D. P.
, Hernández
, A. A.
, Yang
, M. C.
, Otto
, K. N.
, Hölttä-Otto
, K.
, Linsey
, J. S.
, Wood
, K. L.
, and Linden
, A.
, 2014
, “Fundamental Studies in Design-by-Analogy: A Focus on Domain-Knowledge Experts and Applications to Transactional Design Problems
,” Des. Stud.
, 35
(3
), pp. 232
–272
. 61.
Casakin
, H.
, 2012
, “Visual Analogy as a Cognitive Stimulator for Idea Generation in Design Problem Solving
,” The Psychology of Problem Solving: An Interdisciplinary Approach
, S.
Helie
, ed., Nova Science Publishers
, New York
, pp. 1
–20
.62.
Malaga
, R. A.
, 2000
, “The Effect of Stimulus Modes and Associative Distance in Individual Creativity Support Systems
,” Decis. Support Syst.
, 29
(2
), pp. 125
–141
. 63.
Schwert
, P. M.
, 2007
, “Using Sentence and Picture Clues to Solve Verbal Insight Problems
,” Creat. Res. J.
, 19
(2–3
), pp. 293
–306
. 64.
Cardoso
, C.
, and Badke-Schaub
, P.
, 2011
, “The Influence of Different Pictorial Representations During Idea Generation
,” J. Creat. Behav.
, 45
(2
), pp. 130
–146
. 65.
Bilda
, Z.
, and Gero
, J.
, 2007
, “The Impact of Working Memory Limitations on the Design Process During Conceptualization
,” Des. Stud.
, 28
(4
), pp. 343
–367
. 66.
Cubukcu
, E.
, and Cetintahra
, G. E.
, 2010
, “Does Analogical Reasoning With Visual Clues Affect Novice and Experienced Design Students’ Creativity?
,” Creat. Res. J.
, 22
(3
), pp. 337
–344
. 67.
Hanington
, B.
, 2003
, “Methods in the Making: A Perspective on the State of Human Research in Design
,” Des. Issues
, 19
(4
), pp. 9
–18
. 68.
Sanaei
, R.
, Lu
, W.
, Blessing
, L. T. M.
, Otto
, K. N.
, and Wood
, K. L.
, 2017
, “Analogy Retrieval Through Textual Inference
,” Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Cleveland, OH
, Aug. 6–9
, p. 12
.69.
Gonçalves
, M.
, Cardoso
, C.
, and Badke-Schaub
, P.
, 2013
, “Inspiration Peak: Exploring the Semantic Distance Between Design Problem and Textual Inspirational Stimuli
,” Int. J. Des. Creat Innov.
, 1
(4
), pp. 215
–232
. 70.
Casakin
, H.
, and Timmeren
, A.
, 2014
, “Analogies as Creative Inspiration Sources in the Design Studio: The Teamwork
,” Am. J. Archaeol.
, 1
(1
), pp. 51
–64
. 71.
Koronis
, G.
, Casakin
, H.
, Silva
, A.
, and Siew
, J. W. W.
, 2021
, “The Use of Analogies and the Design Brief Information: Impact on Creative Outcomes
,” Proceedings of the ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, Virtual Event
, Aug. 17
, Vol. 85420, p. V006T06A010
.72.
Amabile
, T. M.
, 1996
, Creativity in Context
, 1st ed., Westview Press
, Boulder, CO
, p. 336
.73.
Goldsmith
, R.
, 2011
, “The Validity of a Scale to Measure Global Innovativeness
,” J. Appl. Bus. Res.
, 7
(2
), pp. 89
–97
. 74.
Hallgren
, K. A.
, 2012
, “Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial
,” Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol.
, 8
(1
), pp. 23
–34
. 75.
Goldschmidt
, G.
, 2001
, “Chapter 9—Visual Analogy—A Strategy for Design Reasoning and Learning
,” Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education
, C. M.
Eastman
, W. M.
McCracken
, and W. C.
Newstetter
, eds., Elsevier Science
, Oxford
, pp. 199
–219
.76.
Youmans
, R. J.
, 2011
, “The Effects of Physical Prototyping and Group Work on the Reduction of Design Fixation
,” Des. Stud.
, 32
(2
), pp. 115
–138
. 77.
Youmans
, R. J.
, and Arciszewski
, T.
, 2014
, “Design Fixation: Classifications and Modern Methods of Prevention
,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf.
, 28
(2
), pp. 129
–137
. 78.
Raghunath
, N.
, Koronis
, G.
, and Silva
, A.
, 2020
, “Creativity, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Leadership and Professional Motivations: Comparing Design Students in Different Levels of Undergraduate Education
,” International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education
, Japan
, pp. 77
–82
.79.
Koronis
, G.
, Meurzec
, R. W.
, Silva
, A.
, Leite
, M.
, Henriques
, E.
, and Yogiaman
, C.
, 2019
, “Cross-Cultural Differences in Creative Ideation: A Comparison Between Singaporean and Portuguese Students
,” Proc. Des. Soc.: Int. Conf. Eng. Des.
, 1
(1
), pp. 89
–98
. 80.
Mak
, T. W.
, and Shu
, L. H.
, 2008
, “Using Descriptions of Biological Phenomena for Idea Generation
,” Res. Eng. Des.
, 19
(1
), pp. 21
–28
. Copyright © 2022 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
