Abstract

Thomas Kuhn revolutionized how we think of scientific discovery and innovation when he identified that scientific change can occur on a continuum from incremental developments to drastic change in the form of a paradigm shift. In engineering design, both types of scientific change are critical when exploring the solution space. This study investigates this gap under a psychological safety lens through an empirical study with 64 engineering design student teams over the course of a 4- and 8-week design project. Specifically, we sought to identify the role of cognitive style using KAI scores, derived from Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation (A-I) theory, on the paradigm-relatedness of ideas generated by individuals and teams. Our results identify that cognitive style may not have a direct relationship to the paradigm of ideas an individual generates, or a team selects and develops. Similarly, both individual perceptions and team psychological safety do not predict the paradigm of ideas generated or selected in a team. The results instead identify that the availability of ideas in each paradigm is the primary driver for teams selecting a higher ratio of these ideas during concept screening. These results highlight that cognitive style at the individual and team levels may not be of paramount importance for developing paradigm-challenging ideas, and that teams should instead turn their focus to developing strategies to generate more ideas within the paradigm that fits best with the desired goals of the design tasks.

References

1.
Kuhn
,
T. S.
,
1962
,
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
,
University of Chicago Press
,
Chicago
.
2.
Merriam-Webster
,
Paradigm Shift
,
Merriam-Webster.com dictionary
.
3.
Norman
,
D. A.
, and
Verganti
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research Vs. Technology and Meaning Change
,”
Des. Issues
,
30
(
1
), pp.
78
96
.
4.
Farrell
,
R.
, and
Hooker
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Design, Science and Wicked Problems
,”
Des. Stud.
,
34
(
6
), pp.
681
705
.
5.
Rittel
,
H. W. J.
, and
Webber
,
M. M.
,
1973
, “
Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning
,”
Policy Sci.
,
4
(
2
), pp.
155
169
.
6.
Kirton
,
M.
,
1976
, “
Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure
,”
J. Appl. Psychol.
,
61
(
5
), pp.
622
629
.
7.
Kirton
,
M. J.
,
2011
,
Adaption-Innovation in the Context of Diversity and Change
,
Routledge
,
London, UK
.
8.
Kirton
,
M. J.
,
1984
, “
Adaptors and Innovators—Why New Initiatives Get Blocked
,”
Long Range Plan.
,
17
(
2
), pp.
137
143
.
9.
Jablokow
,
K. W.
,
2008
, “
Developing Problem Solving Leadership: A Cognitive Approach
,”
Int. J. Eng. Educ.
,
24
(
5
), pp.
936
954
.
10.
Menold
,
J.
, and
Jablokow
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Exploring the Effects of Cognitive Style Diversity and Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Final Design Attributes in Student Design Teams
,”
Des. Stud.
,
60
, pp.
71
102
.
11.
Jablokow
,
K. W.
,
Teerlink
,
W.
,
Yilmaz
,
S.
,
Daly
,
S. R.
, and
Silk
,
E. M.
,
2015
, “
The Impact of Teaming and Cognitive Style on Student Perceptions of Design Ideation Outcomes
,”
ASEE Conferences
,
Seattle, WA
,
June 14–17
.
12.
Heininger
,
K.
,
Chen
,
H.-E.
,
Jablokow
,
K.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2018
, “
How Engineering Design Students’ Creative Preferences and Cognitive Styles Impact Their Concept Generation and Screening
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Quebec City, Canada
,
Aug. 26–29
.
13.
Nagasundaram
,
M.
, and
Bostrom
,
R. P.
,
1994
, “
The Structuring of Creative Processes Using GSS: A Framework for Research
,”
J. Manage. Inf. Syst.
,
11
(
3
), pp.
87
114
.
14.
Dean
,
D. L.
,
Hender
,
J.
,
Rodgers
,
T.
, and
Santanen
,
E.
,
2006
, “
Identifying Good Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation
,”
J. Assoc. Inf. Syst.
,
7
(
10
), pp.
646
699
.
15.
Silk
,
E. M.
,
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Jablokow
,
K. W.
,
Yilmaz
,
S.
,
Rechkemmer
,
A.
, and
Wenger
,
J. M.
,
2016
, “
Using Paradigm-Relatedness to Measure Design Ideation Shifts
,”
Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference
,
New Orleans, LA
,
June 26–28
.
16.
Silk
,
E. M.
,
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Jablokow
,
K. W.
, and
McKilligan
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Incremental to Radical Ideas: Paradigm-Relatedness Metrics for Investigating Ideation Creativity and Diversity
,”
Int. J. Des. Creat. Innov.
,
7
(
1–2
), pp.
30
49
.
17.
Paulus
,
P. B.
, and
Brown
,
V. R.
,
2007
, “
Toward More Creative and Innovative Group Idea Generation: A Cognitive-Social-Motivational Perspective of Brainstorming
,”
Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass
,
1
(
1
), pp.
248
265
.
18.
Nijstad
,
B. A.
, and
De Dreu
,
C. K. W.
,
2002
, “
Creativity and Group Innovation
,”
Appl. Psychol.
,
51
(
3
), pp.
400
406
.
19.
Fairchild
,
J.
, and
Hunter
,
S. T.
,
2014
, “
“We've Got Creative Differences”: The Effects of Task Conflict and Participative Safety on Team Creative Performance
,”
J. Creat. Behav.
,
48
(
1
), pp.
64
87
.
20.
Jablokow
,
K. W.
, and
Booth
,
D. E.
,
2006
, “
The Impact and Management of Cognitive Gap in High Performance Product Development Organizations
,”
J. Eng. Technol. Manage.
,
23
(
4
), pp.
313
336
.
21.
Edmondson
,
A.
,
1999
, “
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
,”
Adm. Sci. Q.
,
44
(
2
), pp.
350
383
.
22.
Edmondson
,
A. C.
, and
Lei
,
Z.
,
2014
, “
Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct
,”
Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
23
43
.
23.
Conchie
,
S. M.
,
Donald
,
I. J.
, and
Taylor
,
P. J.
,
2006
, “
Trust: Missing Piece(s) in the Safety Puzzle
,”
Risk Anal.
,
26
(
5
), pp.
1097
1104
.
24.
Gong
,
Y.
,
Cheung
,
S.-Y.
,
Wang
,
M.
, and
Huang
,
J.-C.
,
2012
, “
Unfolding the Proactive Process for Creativity: Integration of the Employee Proactivity, Information Exchange, and Psychological Safety Perspectives
,”
J. Manage.
,
38
(
5
), pp.
1611
1633
.
25.
Kessel
,
M.
,
Kratzer
,
J.
, and
Schultz
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Creative Performance in Healthcare Teams
,”
Creat. Innov. Manage.
,
21
(
2
), pp.
147
157
.
26.
Han
,
S. J.
,
Lee
,
Y.
, and
Beyerlein
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Developing Team Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Safety and Relation-Oriented Shared Leadership
,”
Perform. Improv. Q.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
159
182
.
27.
Lutters
,
E.
,
2014
, “Product Development,”
CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering
,
L.
Laperrière
and
G.
Reinhart
, eds.,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
,
Berlin/Heidelberg
, pp.
991
992
.
28.
Amabile
,
T. M.
,
1988
, “
A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations
,”
Res. Organ. Behav.
,
10
(
1
), pp.
123
167
. ISBN 0-89232-748-0
29.
Rietzschel
,
E. F.
,
Nijstad
,
B. A.
, and
Stroebe
,
W.
,
2006
, “
Productivity Is Not Enough: A Comparison of Interactive and Nominal Brainstorming Groups on Idea Generation and Selection
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
42
(
2
), pp.
244
251
.
30.
Rietzschel
,
E. F.
,
Nijstad
,
B. A.
, and
Stroebe
,
W.
,
2007
, “
Relative Accessibility of Domain Knowledge and Creativity: The Effects of Knowledge Activation on the Quantity and Originality of Generated Ideas
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
43
(
6
), pp.
933
946
.
31.
Cooper
,
R. G.
, and
De Brentani
,
U.
,
1984
, “
Criteria for Screening New Industrial Products
,”
Ind. Mark. Manage.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
149
156
.
32.
Zheng
,
X.
,
Ritter
,
S. C.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2018
, “
How Concept Selection Tools Impact the Development of Creative Ideas in Engineering Design Education
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
140
(
5
), p.
052002
.
33.
Kolodner
,
J. L.
, and
Wills
,
L. M.
,
1996
, “
Powers of Observation in Creative Design
,”
Des. Stud.
,
17
(
4
), pp.
385
416
.
34.
Starkey
,
E. M.
,
Menold
,
J.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2019
, “
When Are Designers Willing to Take Risks? How Concept Creativity and Prototype Fidelity Influence Perceived Risk
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
3
), p.
031104
.
35.
Starkey
,
E.
,
Toh
,
C. A.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2016
, “
Abandoning Creativity: The Evolution of Creative Ideas in Engineering Design Course Projects
,”
Des. Stud.
,
47
, pp.
47
72
.
36.
Toh
,
C. A.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2015
, “
How Engineering Teams Select Design Concepts: A View Through the Lens of Creativity
,”
Des. Stud.
,
38
, pp.
111
138
.
37.
Jablokow
,
K. W.
, and
Kirton
,
M. J.
,
2009
,
Problem Solving, Creativity, and the Level-Style Distinction
,
Springer
,
New York
.
38.
Toh
,
C. A.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2016
, “
Choosing Creativity: The Role of Individual Risk and Ambiguity Aversion on Creative Concept Selection in Engineering Design
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
27
(
3
), pp.
195
219
.
39.
Buffinton
,
K. W.
,
Jablokow
,
K. W.
, and
Martin
,
K. A.
,
2002
, “
Project Team Dynamics and Cognitive Style
,”
Eng. Manage. J.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
25
33
.
40.
Clapp
,
R. G.
, and
De Ciantis
,
S. M.
,
1989
, “
Adaptors and Innovators in Large Organizations: Does Cognitive Style Characterize Actual Behavior of Employees at Work? An Exploratory Study
,”
Psychol. Rep.
,
65
(
2
), pp.
503
513
.
41.
Tekmen-Araci
,
Y.
, and
Mann
,
L.
,
2019
, “
Instructor Approaches to Creativity in Engineering Design Education
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
233
(
2
), pp.
395
402
.
42.
Silk
,
E. M.
,
Rechkemmer
,
A. E.
,
Daly
,
S. R.
,
Jablokow
,
K. W.
, and
McKilligan
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Problem Framing and Cognitive Style: Impacts on Design Ideation Perceptions
,”
Des. Stud.
,
74
, p.
101015
.
43.
Crismond
,
D. P.
, and
Adams
,
R. S.
,
2012
, “
The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
101
(
4
), pp.
738
797
.
44.
Reiter-Palmon
,
R.
,
2009
, “
Problem Identification and Construction: What Do We Know, What Is The Future?
,”
Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts
,
3
(
1
), pp.
43
47
.
45.
Mathieu
,
J. E.
,
Tannenbaum
,
S. I.
,
Donsbach
,
J. S.
, and
Alliger
,
G. M.
,
2014
, “
A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models: Moving Toward a Dynamic and Temporal Framework
,”
J. Manage.
,
40
(
1
), pp.
130
160
.
46.
Choo
,
A. S.
,
Linderman
,
K.
, and
Schroeder
,
R. G.
,
2007
, “
Social and Method Effects on Learning Behaviors and Knowledge Creation in Six Sigma Projects
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
53
(
3
), pp.
437
450
.
47.
Dym
,
C. L.
, and
Little
,
P.
,
2014
,
Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction
,
John Wiley and Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
.
48.
Jonassen
,
D. H.
, and
Cho
,
Y. H.
,
2011
, “
Fostering Argumentation While Solving Engineering Ethics Problems
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
100
(
4
), pp.
680
702
.
49.
Kark
,
R.
, and
Carmeli
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Alive and Creating: The Mediating Role of Vitality and Aliveness in the Relationship Between Psychological Safety and Creative Work Involvement
,”
J. Organ. Behav.
,
30
(
6
), pp.
785
804
.
50.
Cole
,
C.
,
Marhefka
,
J.
,
Jablokow
,
K.
,
Mohammed
,
S.
,
Ritter
,
S.
, and
Miller
,
S.
,
2021
, “
The Crowd Predicts a Paradigm Shift: Exploring the Relationship Between Cognitive Style and the Paradigm-Relatedness of Design Solutions
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual
,
Aug. 17–19
.
51.
Neuman
,
G. A.
,
Wagner
,
S. H.
, and
Christiansen
,
N. D.
,
1999
, “
The Relationship Between Work-Team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams
,”
Group Organ. Manag.
,
24
(
1
), pp.
28
45
.
52.
Mathieu
,
J.
,
Maynard
,
M. T.
,
Rapp
,
T.
, and
Gilson
,
L.
,
2008
, “
Team Effectiveness 1997–2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future
,”
J. Manage.
,
34
(
3
), pp.
410
476
.
53.
Mathieu
,
J. E.
,
Gallagher
,
P. T.
,
Domingo
,
M. A.
, and
Klock
,
E. A.
,
2019
, “
Embracing Complexity: Reviewing the Past Decade of Team Effectiveness Research
,”
Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav.
,
6
(
1
), pp.
17
46
.
54.
Harrison
,
D. A.
, and
Klein
,
K. J.
,
2007
, “
What's the Difference? Diversity Constructs As Separation, Variety, or Disparity in Organizations
,”
Acad. Manage. Rev.
,
32
(
4
), pp.
1199
1228
.
55.
Cole
,
C.
,
Marhefka
,
J.
,
Jablokow
,
K.
,
Mohammed
,
S.
,
Ritter
,
S.
, and
Miller
,
S.
, “
How Engineering Design Students’ Psychological Safety Impacts Team Concept Generation and Screening Practices
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2020 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Virtual
,
Aug. 17–19
.
56.
Shrout
,
P. E.
, and
Fleiss
,
J. L.
,
1979
, “
Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability
,”
Psychol. Bull.
,
86
(
2
), pp.
420
428
.
57.
LeBreton
,
J. M.
, and
Senter
,
J. L.
,
2008
, “
Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement
,”
Organ. Res. Methods
,
11
(
4
), pp.
815
852
.
58.
Galbraith
,
S.
,
Daniel
,
J. A.
, and
Vissel
,
B.
,
2010
, “
A Study of Clustered Data and Approaches to Its Analysis
,”
J. Neurosci.
,
30
(
32
), pp.
10601
10608
.
59.
Gelman
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Multilevel (Hierarchical) Modeling: What It Can and Cannot Do
,”
Technometrics
,
48
(
3
), pp.
432
435
.
60.
Daly
,
A.
,
Dekker
,
T.
, and
Hess
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Dummy Coding Vs Effects Coding for Categorical Variables: Clarifications and Extensions
,”
J. Choice Model.
,
21
, pp.
36
41
.
61.
Van der Vegt
,
G. S.
,
de Jong
,
S. B.
,
Bunderson
,
J. S.
, and
Molleman
,
E.
,
2010
, “
Power Asymmetry and Learning in Teams: The Moderating Role of Performance Feedback
,”
Organ. Sci.
,
21
(
2
), pp.
347
361
.
You do not currently have access to this content.