In switched-control methodology, which integrates several controllers handling different environmental conditions for dynamic positioning (DP) systems in marine vessels, the supervisor uses the estimated wave peak frequency (WPF) to classify the existing environmental condition so as to switch to the appropriate controller. The WPF is assumed to be the same as the peak frequency of the vessel’s response spectrum at wave frequency estimated by fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the measured position and heading. Using a short window width leads to error in the WPF estimation whereas a longer width causes a significant time lag in control activation. This paper addresses the effect of uncertainty in the estimation of WPF by FFT on the reliability of the switched-controller based DP vessel. The probability of the supervisor switching to a wrong controller due to WPF estimation error is first evaluated for four different environmental conditions. The failure probabilities of the system with and without WPF uncertainty are then evaluated and compared. Numerical simulation based on a supply vessel shows that the increase in failure probability of the switched-controller DP system due to the uncertainty in the estimated WPF by FFT is not significant compared with the failure probability of a perfect switched-controller DP system.

1.
Balchen
,
J. G.
,
Jenssen
,
N. A.
, and
Sælid
,
S.
, 1976, “
Dynamic Positioning Using Kalman Filtering and Optimal Control Theory
,”
IFAC/IFIP Symposium on Automation in Offshore Oil Field Operation
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp.
183
186
.
2.
Grimble
,
M. J.
,
Patton
,
R. J.
, and
Wise
,
D. A.
, 1980, “
Use of Kalman Filtering Techniques in Dynamic Positioning Systems
,”
IEE Proc.-D: Control Theory Appl.
0143-7054,
127
(
3
), pp.
93
102
.
3.
Sørensen
,
A. J.
,
Sagatun
,
S. I.
, and
Fossen
,
T. I.
, 1996, “
Design of a Dynamic Position System Using Model-Based Control
,”
Control Eng. Pract.
0967-0661,
4
(
3
), pp.
359
368
.
4.
Sørensen
,
A. J.
, 2005, “
Marine Cybernetics: Modelling and Control
,” Department of Marine Technology, NTNU, Report No. UK-05-76.
5.
Strand
,
J. P.
, 1999, “
Nonlinear Position Control Systems Design for Marine Vessels
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
6.
Lindegaard
,
K. P. W.
, 2003, “
Acceleration Feedback in Dynamic Positioning
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
7.
Fossen
,
T. I.
, 2002,
Marine Control Systems: Guidance Navigation and Control of Ships Rigs and Underwater Vehicles
,
Marine Cybernetics
,
Trondheim, Norway
.
8.
Nguyen
,
T. D.
,
Sørensen
,
A. J.
, and
Quek
,
S. T.
, 2007, “
Design of High Level Hybrid Controller for Dynamic Positioning From Calm to Extreme Sea Conditions
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
43
(
5
), pp.
768
785
.
9.
Sørensen
,
A. J.
,
Strand
,
J. P.
, and
Nyberg
,
H.
, 2002, “
Dynamic Positioning of Ships and Floaters in Extreme Seas
,”
Proceedings of OCEANS'02 MTS/IEEE
, Biloxi, MS.
10.
Hespanha
,
J. P.
, 2001, “
Tutorial on Supervisory Control, Lecture Notes for the Workshop
,”
Control Using Logic and Switching for the 40th Conference on Decision and Control
, Orlando, FL.
11.
Hespanha
,
J. P.
, and
Morse
,
A. S.
, 2002, “
Switching Between Stabilizing Controllers
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
38
(
11
), pp.
1905
1917
.
12.
Hespanha
,
J. P.
,
Liberzon
,
D.
, and
Morse
,
A. S.
, 2003, “
Hysteresis-Based Switching Algorithms for Supervisory Control of Uncertain Systems
,”
Automatica
0005-1098,
39
(
2
), pp.
263
272
.
13.
Chen
,
H.
, and
Moan
,
T.
, 2004, “
Probabilistic Modeling and Evaluation of Collision Between Shuttle Tanker and FPSO in Tandem Offloading
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
0951-8320,
84
, pp.
169
186
.
14.
Gray
,
J. N. P.
, and
Macdonald
,
I. F.
, 1982, “
Safety Study of Part of a Dynamic Positioning System for a Diving-Support Ship
,”
Reliab. Eng.
,
3
, pp.
179
192
.
15.
Leira
,
B. J.
,
Sørensen
,
A. J.
,
Berntsen
,
P. I.
, and
Aamo
,
O. M.
, 2006, “
Structural Reliability Criteria and Dynamic Positioning of Marine Vessels
,”
International Journal of Materials & Structural Reliability
,
4
(
2
), pp.
161
174
.
16.
Price
,
W. G.
, and
Bishop
,
R. E. D.
, 1974,
Probabilistic Theory of Ship Dynamics
,
Chapman and Hall
,
London
.
17.
Johannessen
,
K.
,
Meling
,
T. S.
, and
Haver
,
S. ,
2002, “
Joint Distribution for Wind and Waves in the Northern North Sea
,”
Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.
1053-5381,
12
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.
18.
Khalil
,
H. K.
, 2002,
Nonlinear Systems
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
19.
Böling
,
J. M.
,
Seborg
,
D.
, and
Hespanha
,
J.
, 2005, “
Multi-Model Control of a Simulated pH
,”
The 16th World Congress of International Federation of Automation Control
.
20.
Perez
,
T.
, and
Fossen
,
T. I.
, 2007, “
Tutorial on Modelling and Simulation of Marine System Dynamics
,”
IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems (CAMS)
, Bol, Croatia.
21.
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
, 1990,
Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
.
22.
WAMIT
, 2007, User manual, http://www.wamit.comhttp://www.wamit.com, WAMIT, Inc.
23.
Fathi
,
D.
, and
Hoff
,
J. R.
, 2004, ShipX Vessel Responses (VERES), Theory Manual, Marintek AS, Feb. 13.
24.
Lee
,
W. T.
,
Bales
,
W. L.
, and
Sowby
,
S. E.
, 1985, “
Standardized Wind and Wave Environments for North Pacific Ocean Areas
,” DTNSRDC, Report No. R/SPD-0919-02.
You do not currently have access to this content.