This study addresses numerical modeling and time-domain simulations of the lowering operation for installation of an offshore wind turbine monopile (MP) with a diameter of 5.7 m and examines the nonstationary dynamic responses of the lifting system in irregular waves. Due to the time-varying properties of the system and the resulting nonstationary dynamic responses, numerical simulation of the entire lowering process is challenging to model. For slender structures, strip theory is usually applied to calculate the excitation forces based on Morison's formula with changing draft. However, this method neglects the potential damping of the structure and may overestimate the responses even in relatively long waves. Correct damping is particularly important for the resonance motions of the lifting system. On the other hand, although the traditional panel method takes care of the diffraction and radiation, it is based on steady-state condition and is not valid in the nonstationary situation, as in this case in which the monopile is lowered continuously. Therefore, this paper has two objectives. The first objective is to examine the importance of the diffraction and radiation of the monopile in the current lifting model. The second objective is to develop a new approach to address this behavior more accurately. Based on the strip theory and Morison's formula, the proposed method accounts for the radiation damping of the structure during the lowering process in the time-domain. Comparative studies between different methods are presented, and the differences in response using two types of installation vessel in the numerical model are also investigated.

References

1.
Mukerji
,
P.
,
1988
, “
Hydrodynamic Responses of Derrick Vessels in Waves During Heavy Lift Operation
,”
20th Offshore Technology Conference
,
Houston
, TX, May 2–5.
2.
van den Boom
,
H.
,
Dekker
,
J.
, and
Dallinga
,
R.
,
1988
, “
Computer Analysis of Heavy Lift Operations
,”
20th Offshore Technology Conference
,
Houston
, TX, May 2–5.
3.
Baar
,
J.
,
Pijfers
,
J.
, and
Santen
,
J.
,
1992
, “
Hydromechanically Coupled Motions of a Crane Vessel and a Transport Barge
,”
24th Offshore Technology Conference
,
Houston
, TX, May 4–7.
4.
Witz
,
J.
,
1995
, “
Parametric Excitation of Crane Loads in Moderate Sea States
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
22
(
4
), pp.
411
420
.
5.
Park
,
K.
,
Cha
,
J.
, and
Lee
,
K.
,
2011
, “
Dynamic Factor Analysis Considering Elastic Boom Effects in Heavy Lifting Operations
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
38
(
10
), pp.
1100
1113
.
6.
Molin
,
B.
,
2001
, “
On the Added Mass and Damping of Periodic Arrays of Fully or Partially Porous Disks
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
15
(
2
), pp.
275
290
.
7.
Sandvik
,
P. C.
,
Solaas
,
F.
, and
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
2006
, “
Hydrodynamic Forces on Ventilated Structures
,”
16th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
San Francisco, CA
, May 28–June 2, pp.
54
58
.
8.
N æss
,
T.
,
Havn
,
J.
, and
Solaas
,
F.
,
2014
, “
On the Importance of Slamming During Installation of Structures With Large Suction Anchors
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
89
, pp.
99
112
.
9.
Sandvik
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Estimation of Extreme Response From Operations Involving Transients
,”
2nd Marine Operations Specialty Symposium
,
Singapore
, Aug. 6–8.
10.
Li
,
L.
,
Gao
,
Z.
,
Moan
,
T.
, and
Ormberg
,
H.
,
2014
, “
Analysis of Lifting Operation of a Monopile for an Offshore Wind Turbine Considering Vessel Shielding Effects
,”
Mar. Struct.
,
39
, pp.
287
314
.
11.
Morison
,
J.
,
Johnson
,
J.
, and
Schaaf
,
S.
,
1950
, “
The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles
,”
J. Pet. Technol.
,
2
(
5
), pp.
149
154
.
12.
Kim
,
M.
, and
Ran
,
Z.
,
1994
, “
Responses of an Articulated Tower in Waves and Currents
,”
Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.
,
4
(
4
), pp.
298
301
.
13.
Anam
,
I.
, and
Roësset
,
J. E. M.
,
2004
, “
Slender-Body Approximations of Hydrodynamic Forces for Spar Platforms
,”
Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.
,
14
(
2
).
14.
Rainey
,
R.
,
1989
, “
A New Equation for Calculating Wave Loads on Offshore Structures
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
204
, pp.
295
324
.
15.
Kim
,
M.-H.
, and
Yue
,
D. K.
,
1989
, “
The Complete Second-Order Diffraction Solution for an Axisymmetric Body Part 1. Monochromatic Incident Waves
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
200
, pp.
235
264
.
16.
Taylor
,
R. E.
,
Rainey
,
R.
, and
Dai
,
D.
,
1992
, “
Non-Linear Hydrodynamic Analysis of TLP's in Extreme Waves: Slender Body and Diffraction Theories Compared
,”
International Conference on the Behaviour of Offshore Structures
,
London, UK
, July 7–10, pp.
569
584
.
17.
Kim
,
M.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
1994
, “
Slender-Body Approximation for Slowly-Varying Wave Loads in Multi-Directional Waves
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
16
(
3
), pp.
141
163
.
18.
Golightly
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Tilting of Monopiles Long, Heavy and Stiff; Pushed Beyond Their Limits
,” Technical Note, Ground Engineering.
19.
Lee
,
C.
,
1995
,
WAMIT Theory Manual
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Ocean Engineering, Cambridge, MA
.
20.
Faltinsen
,
O.
,
1990
,
Sea Loads on Ships and Ocean Structures
,
Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
.
21.
Cummins
,
W.
,
1962
, “
The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions
,”
Schiffstechnik
,
9
(
47
), pp.
101
109
.
22.
MARINTEK
,
2012
,
SIMO Theory Manual Version 4.0
, Trondheim, Norway.
23.
DNV
,
2010
, Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C205, Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads.
24.
Isaacson
,
M. D. S. Q.
,
1979
, “
Nonlinear Inertia Forces on Bodies
,”
J. Waterw., Port Coastal Ocean Div.
,
105
(
3
), pp.
213
227
.
You do not currently have access to this content.