Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

Abstract

The dynamic behavior of risers is highly influenced by the floating production unit (FPU) motions, associated with environmental loads, caused by waves, current, and wind. Particularly, as well known, under potential flow modeling, wave loads may be represented through power series expansions, with respect to a small parameter ε. First-order wave forces pulsate in the frequency range of the incident wave spectra, whereas second-order wave forces are related to sum or difference frequencies of the same spectra. The so-called second-order difference frequencies forces may then be responsible by resonating motions of the vessel in that range. Significant low-frequency motions due to second-order forces are commonly observed in the horizontal plane, resonating low natural frequencies of moored floating systems characterized by low mooring stiffnesses. Recently, however, this phenomenon was also observed for roll motions in several new floating production storage and offloading (FPSOs) that will operate in the pre-salt of Santos Basin. The phenomenon had already been detected in a deep draft semi-submersible in Campos Basin, but only more recently in FPSOs. The new floating units are characterized by high roll natural periods, above the typical wave period range in the pre-salt region, and the roll response to the second-order difference frequencies forces can be significant. This phenomenon was indeed detected in model tests and confirmed by numerical studies. In fact, this additional FPSO roll behavior occurs in typical periods slightly above 20 s, imposing displacements and accelerations that can directly affect the dynamics of the riser top region. The present paper addresses this phenomenon and its possible impact on steel lazy-wave riser (SLWR) designs.

References

1.
Matos
,
V. L. F.
,
Simos
,
A. N.
, and
Sphaier
,
S. H.
,
2011
, “
Second Order Resonant Heave, Roll and Pitch Motions of a Deep-Draft Semisubmersible: Theoretical and Experimental Results
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
38
(
17–18
), pp.
2227
2243
.
2.
Simos
,
A. N.
,
Sparano
,
J. V.
,
Aranha
,
J. A. P.
, and
Matos
,
V. L. F.
,
2008
, “
2nd Order Hydrodynamic Effects on Resonant Heave, Pitch and Roll Motions of a Large-Volume Semi-submersible Platform
,”
Proceedings of ASME 2008 International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
, Paper No. OMAE2008-57430.
3.
Torres
,
F. G. S.
,
Sphaier
,
S. H.
,
Masetti
,
I. Q.
,
Costa
,
A. P. S.
, and
Sales Jr.
,
J. S.
,
2007
, “
Hydrodynamic Design of a Monocolumn Platform Avoiding Excessive Heave and Pitch Motions
,”
PRADS
,
Houston
, Paper No. PRADS 2007-29024.
4.
Liu
,
Y.
,
2003
, “
On Second-Order Roll Motions of Ships
,”
Proceedings of ASME 2003 International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
, Paper No. OMAE2003-37022.
5.
Newman
,
J. N.
,
1974
, “Second Order, Slowly Varying Forces on Vessels in Irregular Waves,”
Proc. Int. Symp. Dynamics of Marine Vehicles and Structures in Waves
,
R. E. D.
Bishop
, and
W. G.
Price
, eds.,
Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd
,
London
, pp.
182
186
.
6.
Ferreira
,
M. D.
,
Torres
,
F.
,
Cueva
,
D. R.
,
Ceppollina
,
D.
,
Pinheiro
,
S.
,
Correa Jr.
,
H.
, and
Umeda
,
C.
,
2005
, “
Hydrodynamic Aspects of the New Build FPSOBR
,”
Second International Workshop on Applied Offshore Hydrodynamics IWAOH 2005
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Apr. 14–15
, pp.
1
13
.
7.
Rezende
,
F. C.
,
Oliveira
,
A. C.
,
Chen
,
X.
, and
Menezes
,
F. G. T.
,
2013
, “
A Comparison of Different Approximations for Computing Second Order Roll Motions for a FLNG
,”
Proceedings of ASME 2013 International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
, Paper No. OMAE2013-11004.
8.
Chads
,
C. E. H.
,
2015
, “
Movimento de Balanço Devido a Movimentos Hidrodinâmicos de Segunda Ordem de Um FPSO
,”
Master dissertation
,
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
,
Rio de Janeiro
.
9.
WAMIT Inc
, WAMIT User Manual—Versions 6.4, 6.4S, Chestnut Hill, MA. http://www.wamit.com/manual6.htm
10.
Mourelle
,
M. M.
,
Gonzales
,
E. C.
, and
Jacob
,
B. P.
,
1995
, “
ANFLEX–Computational System for Flexible and Rigid Riser Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Offshore Engineering
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp.
441
458
.
11.
Vianna
,
F. L. V.
,
Grützmacher
,
E.
,
Gonçalves
,
J. A. O.
,
Ferreira
,
R. P.
,
Gomes
,
C. N.
, and
Ferreira
,
F. M.
,
2015
, “
Standardization of Critical Long Lead Items of Subsea Rigid Pipeline Structures
,”
Rio Pipeline Conference RPC2015—IBP1101_15
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
. https://biblioteca.ibp.org.br/pt-BR/search/35611?exp=IBP1101_15&exp_default=
12.
Senra
,
S. F.
,
Aguiar
,
L. L.
,
Hippert
,
E.
,
Garmbis
,
A. G.
,
Santos
,
M.
,
Martins
,
M. A. D.
, and
Nunes
,
L. M. P.
,
2019
, “
Fatigue Assessment of SLWR Riser in Brazilian Pre-salt: The Impact of Slope Changing Point in SN Curve
,”
Proceedings of ASME 2019 International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
, Paper No. OMAE2019-96592.
You do not currently have access to this content.