HB7, an ultra-clean, high strength pressure vessel steel manufactured in France, is compared to A723 steel. This steel, suggested as an improved pressure vessel material is currently being proposed for critical applications, and will likely be used more frequently as design engineers discover its capabilities. This paper includes comparisons of strength, fracture toughness, fatigue properties and composition of the two steels, followed by an in-depth comparison and modeling of environmental cracking resistance, Bauschinger-modified residual stresses and fatigue lives. Results indicate that in all critical areas, with the exception of Bauschinger-reduced residual stress, the HB7 is superior to the A723 steel. Particularly for small amounts of autofrettage, near-bore residual stresses are reduced for HB7 steel compared to those for A723 steel at the same strength level. The greatest improvement of the HB7 over the A723 is in environmental cracking resistance. The HB7, when tested in concentrated sulfuric acid, exhibits five orders of magnitude longer crack incubation times and three orders of magnitude slower crack growth rates, when compared to A723 steel at the same strength level.

1.
Troiano, A. R., 1960, Trans ASM, 52, p. 54.
2.
Carter, C. S., 1971, Corrosion, 27(11).
3.
Gangloff, R. P., 2001, “Diffusion of Hydrogen Environment Embrittlement in High Strength Alloys,” N. R. Moody and A. W. Thompson, eds., The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA.
4.
Vigilante, G. N., Underwood, J. H., Crayon, D., Tauscher, S., Sage, T., and Troiano, E., 1997, “Hydrogen-Induced Cracking Test of High-Strength Steels and Nickel-Iron Base Alloys Using the Bolt-Loaded Specimen,” ASTM STP 1321, pp. 602–616.
5.
Wei
,
R. P.
, and
Novak
,
S. R.
,
1987
, “
Interlaboratory Evaluation of KISCC and da/dt Determination Procedures for High Strength Steels
,”
J. Test. Eval.
,
15
(1) pp.
38
75
.
6.
Vigilante, G. N., Underwood, J. H., and Crayon, D., 1999, “Use of the Instrumented Bolt and Constant Displacement Bolt-Loaded Specimen to Measure In-Situ Hydrogen Crack Growth in High Strength Steels,” ASTM STP 1360.
7.
ASTM E1681, 2003, Determining Threshold Stress Intensity Factors for Environment-Assisted Cracking of Metallic Materials, Vol. 3.01, ASTM.
8.
Gerberich, W. W., 1974, “Effect of Hydrogen on High-Strength and Martensitic Steels,” Hydrogen in Metals, I. M. Bernstein and Anthony W. Thompson, eds., American Society of Metals, pp. 115–147.
9.
Spencer, G. L., 1987, “Hydrogen Embrittlement of Gun Steel,” ARDEC Technical Report ARCCB-TR-87030.
10.
Bauschinger, J., 1881, “Ueber die Veranderung der Elasticitatagrenze und dea Elasticitatamoduls verschiadener Metalle,” Zivilingenieur, 27, columns 289–348.
11.
Troiano, E., Parker, A. P., Underwood, J. H., and Mossey, C., “Experimental Data, Numerical Fit and Fatigue Life Calculations Relating to Bauschinger Effect in High Strength Armament Steels,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 125, pp. 330–334.
12.
Parker
,
A. P.
,
Troiano
,
E.
,
Underwood
,
J. H.
, and
Mossey
,
C.
,
2003
, “
Characterization of Steels Using a Revised Kinematic Hardening Model Incorporating Bauschinger Effect
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
125
, pp.
277
281
.
13.
Parker
,
A. P.
,
2001
, “
Autofrettage of Open End Tubes—Pressures, Stresses, Strains and Code Comparisons
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
123
, pp.
271
281
.
You do not currently have access to this content.