The accurate evaluation scheme for creep-fatigue strength is one of the continuing main issues for elevated temperature design; particularly, the three-dimensional structure having stress concentration is becoming more important. The present paper investigates fatigue strength and creep-fatigue strength of perforated plate having stress concentration as an example. The specimens are made of type 304 SUS stainless steel, and the temperature is kept to 550°C. The whole cycles of the experiment record are analyzed, and the characteristics of the structure having stress concentration are discussed. The present paper employs stress redistribution locus (abbreviated as SRL) in evaluation plastic behavior in cyclic fatigue process as well as stress relaxation in creep process, and the feasibility is discussed in conjunction with the comparison to experimental results.

1.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, 1995, “
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
,” Section 3, Division 1—Subsection NH.
2.
Association Francaise pour les regles de conception et de Construction des materials des chaudieres Electro-Nuclearires (AFCEN
, 1985, “
Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of FBR Nuclear Islands, RCC-MR
.”
3.
Nuclear Electric plc, 1995, “
An Assessment Procedure for High Temperature Response of Structures
,” R5, Issue
2
.
4.
Neuber
,
H.
, 1961, “
Theory of Stress Concentration for Shear Strained Prismatic Bodies with Arbitrary Nonlinear Stress-Strain Law
,”
Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
28
, pp.
544
550
.
5.
Japan Atomic Power Corporation
, 1998, “
Demonstration Design Standard at Elevated Temperature
,” (in Japanese).
6.
Iida
,
K.
,
Asada
,
Y.
,
Okabayashi
,
K.
, and
Nagata
,
T.
, 1987, “
Simplified Analysis and Design for Elevated Temperature Components of MONJU
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
0029-5493,
98
, pp.
305
317
.
7.
Kasahara
,
N.
, 2001, “
Strain Concentration at Structural Discontinuities and its Prediction Based on Characteristics of Compliance Change in Structures
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. A
1340-8046,
44
(
3
), pp.
354
361
.
8.
Marriott
,
D. L.
et al.
, 1994,
Simplified Analysis Methods for Elevated Temperature Life Assessment
,
Technology for 90’s
, Chapter 10,
ASME
, Materials Park,
OH
.
9.
Shimakawa
,
T.
,
Watanabe
,
O.
,
Kasahara
,
N.
,
Kobayashi
,
K.
,
Takizawa
,
M.
, and
Asada
,
S.
, 2002, “
Creep-Fatigue Life Evaluation Based on Stress Redistribution Locus (SRL) Method
,”
JPVRC Symposium 2002
, pp.
87
95
.
10.
High Pressure Institute of Japan
, 2005, “
Creep-Fatigue Life Evaluation Scheme for Ferritic Component at Elevated Temperature
,” HPIS C 107 TR 2005 (in Japanese).
11.
Kato
,
T.
, and
Asayama
,
T.
, 2003, “
Material Strength and Structural Reliability Evaluation System Ver 1.0 Users Manual (MSS-REAL Ver 1.0)
,” JNC TN9520 2003–002, pp.
1
132
.
12.
Campbell
,
R. D.
, 1971, “
Creep/Fatigue Interaction Correlation for 304 Stainless Steel Subjected to Strain-Controlled Cycling with Hold Time at Peak Strain
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817, pp.
887
892
.
13.
Aoto
,
K.
,
Kawasaki
,
H.
,
Wada
,
Y.
, and
Nihei
,
I.
, 1989, “
Analytical Study on Correlationship between Stress Relaxation and Creep Deformation Behavior of Ferritic Steels
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930, pp.
9
14
.
You do not currently have access to this content.