Abstract

Decommissioning is expensive and can be a complex operation involving a series of distinct phases, including cessation of operation, site preparation, decontamination, dismantling (demolition) and disposal. Each decommissioning phase has associated risks, which need to be identified, controlled, and minimized as far as reasonably practicable. A risk-based approach has been recognized, both for ensuring safety and reducing the total decommissioning period with cost savings. A traditional hazard and operability (HAZOP) study can be conveniently extended to decommissioning HAZOP, which is a guideword-based collective multidisciplinary study identifying types of risks associated with decommissioning and allocates actions to the contractor and specialists departments for implementation. A decommissioning HAZOP enables to address the hazards and risks of decommissioning activities holistically, addresses all major contingencies, and results in safe decommissioning within budget. The presented decommissioning HAZOP study itself was completed ahead of time, without accidents. While there are other methods, decommissioning HAZOP and risk assessment was recognized as one of the effective methods for achieving the safety and project cost objectives.

References

1.
SafeWork Australia
,
2012
,
Managing the Risks of Plant in the Workplace: Code of Practice
,
Government of Australia
,
Canberra, Australia
.
2.
Government of New South Wales,
2011
,
Workplace Health & Safety Regulations
,
Government of New South Wales
,
Sydney, Australia
.
3.
Department of Environment, Climate Change, NSW
,
2009
, “Guidelines for Implementing the Protection of the Environment, Underground Petroleum Storage Systems Regulation 2008,”
Department of Environment, Climate Change
,
NSW, Sydney, Australia
.
4.
Environmental Protection Authority, NSW,
2014
,
Protection of the Environment Operations (Waste) Regulation
,
Environmental Protection Authority
,
Sydney, Australia
.
5.
Gyenes
,
Z.
, and
Wood
,
M. H.
,
2016
, “
Lessons Learned From Major Accidents Relating to Ageing of Chemical Plants
,”
Chem. Eng. Trans.
,
48
, pp.
733
738
.
6.
NOPSEMA,
2021
, “Decommissioning,” NOPSEMA, Perth, Australia, Dec. 2, 2021, https://www.nopsema.gov.au/offshore-industry/decommissioning
7.
Nelson
,
J.
,
Wilkinson
,
R.
,
Kruzic
,
M.
,
Morton
,
M.
, Sr.
,
Whittall
,
S.
,
Love
,
G.
, and
Bailey
,
B.
,
2016
, “‘
Top 10' Facility Decommissioning Risks and Mitigation Strategies to Prevent Them—16487
,”
WM2016 Conference
, Phoenix, AZ, Mar. 6–10, Paper No. 16487.
8.
Vann
,
R.
,
2019
,
How to Begin Chemical Plant Decommissioning
,
AIChE, Chemical Engineering Progress
,
New York
.
9.
Joubert
,
F.
,
Steyn
,
E.
, and
Pretorius
,
L.
,
2021
, “
Using the HAZOP Method to Conduct a Risk Assessment on the Dismantling of Large Industrial Machines and Associated Structures: Case Study
,”
J. Constr. Eng. Manage.
,
147
(
1
), p.
05020021
.10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001942
10.
Crawley
,
F.
, and
Tyler
,
B.
,
2015
,
HAZOP: Guide to Best Practice
,
The Institution of Chemical Engineers
,
Rugby, England
.
11.
British Standards Institution
,
2009
, “
Risk Management—Guidelines
,”
BSI
,
London
, Standard No. BS ISO 31000.
12.
British Standards Institution
,
2016
, “Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP Studies),”
BSI
,
London
, Standard No. BS EN 61882.
13.
Abhisam Software Pvt Ltd,
2011
, “Plant Decommissioning White Paper – How to Decontaminate, Dismantle and Decommission Process Plants,”
Abhisam Software Pvt Ltd
,
Miami, FL
, accessed Nov. 28, 2021, https://www.abhisam.com/how-to-decontaminate-dismantle-docommission-process-chemical-plants/
14.
Vann
,
R.
,
2019
, “
Chemical Decommissioning: Safety Challenges
,”
The Chemical Engineer
,
London
.
15.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
,
2009
, “DOE-WVDP Phase 1 Decommissioning Plan (DP), West Valley Demonstration Project,”
NRC
,
West Valley, NY
, accessed Nov. 28, 2021, www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/complex/wv.html
16.
Hicks
,
D. I.
,
Crittenden
,
B. D.
, and
Warhurst
,
A. C.
,
2000
, “
Design for Decommissioning: Addressing the Future Closure of Chemical Sites in the Design of New Plant
,”
Process Saf. Environ. Prot.
,
78
(
6
), pp.
465
479
.10.1205/095758200531014
You do not currently have access to this content.