Horizontal axis wind turbines routinely suffer significant time varying aerodynamic loads that adversely impact structures, mechanical components, and power production. As lighter and more flexible wind turbines are designed to reduce overall cost of energy, greater accuracy and reliability will become even more crucial in future aerodynamics models. However, to render calculations tractable, current modeling approaches admit various approximations that can degrade model predictive accuracy. To help understand the impact of these modeling approximations and improve future models, the current effort seeks to document and comprehend the vortex kinematics for three-dimensional, unsteady, vortex dominated flows occurring on horizontal axis wind turbine blades during non-zero yaw conditions. To experimentally characterize these flows, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment turbine was erected in the NASA Ames 80 ft×120 ft wind tunnel. Then, under strictly-controlled inflow conditions, turbine blade surface pressures and local inflow velocities were acquired at multiple radial locations. Surface pressure histories and normal force records were used to characterize dynamic stall vortex kinematics and normal forces. Stall vortices occupied approximately two-thirds of the aerodynamically active blade span and persisted for nearly one-fourth of the blade rotation cycle. Stall vortex convection varied dramatically along the blade radius, yielding pronounced dynamic stall vortex deformation. Analysis of these data revealed systematic alterations to vortex kinematics due to changes in test section speed, yaw error, and blade span location.
Issue Section:
Technical Papers
1.
Simms, D., Schreck, S., Hand, M., and Fingersh, L., (In Review), “Results of a Blind Comparison of Wind Turbine Model Predictions to Measurements of NREL’s Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment in the NASA Ames Wind Tunnel,” NREL Tech. Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
2.
McCroskey
, W. J.
, 1977
, “Some Current Research in Unsteady Fluid Dynamics–The 1976 Freeman Scholar Lecture
,” ASME J. Fluids Eng.
, 99
, No. 1
, pp. 8
–39
.3.
Carr
, L. W.
, 1988
, “Progress in Analysis and Prediction of Dynamic Stall
,” J. of Aircraft
, 25
, No. 1
, pp. 6
–17
.4.
Butterfield, C., Hansen, A., Simms, D., and Scott, G., 1991, “Dynamic Stall on Wind Turbine Blades,” NREL/TP-257-4510, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
5.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., Robinson, M., Luttges, M., and Simms, D., 1994, “Evidence that Aerodynamic Effects, Including Dynamic Stall, Dictate HAWT Structure Loads and Power Generation in Highly Transient Time Frames,” NREL/TP-441-7080, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
6.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., and Robinson, M., 1995, “Dynamic Stall Occurrence on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade,” NREL/TP-442-6912, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
7.
Robinson, M., Galbraith, R., Shipley, D., and Miller, M., 1995, “Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” AIAA 95-0526, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.
8.
Huyer
, S.
, Simms
, D.
, and Robinson
, M.
, 1996
, “Unsteady Aerodynamics Associated with a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
,” AIAA J.
, 34
, No. 7
, pp. 1410
–1419
.9.
Hansen
, A.
, Butterfield
, C.
, and Cui
, X.
, 1990
, “Yaw Loads and Motions of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
,” J. Sol. Energy Eng.
112
, No. 4
, pp. 310
–314
.10.
Freymuth
, P.
, 1988
, “Three-Dimensional Vortex Systems of Finite Wings
,” J. of Aircraft
, 25
, No. 10
, pp. 971
–972
.11.
Robinson, M., and Wissler, J., 1988, “Unsteady Surface Pressure Measurements on a Pitching Wing,” AIAA 88-0328, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting.
12.
Lorber, P., Carta, F., and Covino, A., 1992, “An Oscillating Three-Dimensional Wing Experiment: Compressibility, Sweep, Rate, Waveform, and Geometry Effects on Unsteady Separation and Dynamic Stall,” UTRC Report R92-958325-6.
13.
Schreck, S., Addington, G., and Luttges, M., 1991, “Flow Field Structure and Development Near the Root of a Straight Wing Pitching at Constant Rate,” AIAA 91-1793, AIAA 22nd Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conf.
14.
Schreck
, S.
, and Helin
, H.
, 1994
, “Unsteady Vortex Dynamics and Surface Pressure Topologies on a Finite Pitching Wing
,” J. Aircr.
, 31
, No. 4
, pp. 899
–907
.15.
Piziali, R., 1994, “2-D and 3-D Oscillating Wing Aerodynamics for a Range of Angles of Attack Including Stall,” NASA TM 4632.
16.
Galbraith, R., Coton, F., Jiang, D., and Gilmour, R., 1995, “Preliminary Results from a Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall Experiment of a Finite Wing,” Paper No. 2–3, 21st European Rotorcraft Forum.
17.
Coton
, F.
, and Galbraith
, R.
, 1999
, “An Experimental Study of Dynamic Stall on a Finite Wing
,” Aeronaut. J.
, 103
, No. 1023
, pp. 229
–236
.18.
Schreck, S., Robinson, M., Hand, M., and Simms, D., 2000, “HAWT Dynamic Stall Response Asymmetries Under Yawed Flow Conditions,” AIAA 2000-0040, 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.
19.
Himmelskamp, H, 1945, “Profiluntersuchungen an einem umlaufenden Propeller” (“Profile Investigations on a Rotating Airscrew”), Dissertation, Gottingen; Mitt. Max-Planck-Institut fur Stromungsforschung Gottingen Nr. 2.
20.
Banks
, W.
, and Gadd
, G.
, 1963
, “Delaying Effect of Rotation on Laminar Separation
,” AIAA J.
, 1
, No. 4
, pp. 941
–942
.21.
McCroskey
, W.
, and Yaggy
, P.
, 1968
, “Laminar Boundary Layers on Helicopter Rotors in Forward Flight
,” AIAA J.
, 6
, No. 10
, pp. 1919
–1926
.22.
McCroskey, W., 1971, “Measurements of Boundary Layer Transition, Separation and Streamline Direction on Rotating Blades,” NASA TN D-6321.
23.
Madsen
, H.
, and Christensen
, H.
, 1990
, “On the Relative Importance of Rotational, Unsteady and Three-Dimensional Effects on the HAWT Rotor Aerodynamics
,” Wind Eng.
, 14
, No. 6
, pp. 405
–415
.24.
Barnsley
, M.
, and Wellicome
, J.
, 1992
, “Wind Tunnel Investigation of Stall Aerodynamics for a 1.0 m Horizontal Axis Rotor
,” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
, 39
, pp. 11
–21
.25.
Ronsten
, G.
, 1992
, “Static Pressure Measurements on a Rotating and a Non-Rotating 2.375 m Wind Turbine Blade. Comparison with 2D Calculations
,” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
, 39
, pp. 105
–118
.26.
Butterfield, C., Musial, W., and Simms, D., 1992, “Combined Experiment Phase I Final Report.” NREL/TP-257-4655, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
27.
Miller, M., Shipley, D., Young, T., Robinson, M., Luttges, M., and Simms, D., 1995, “Combined Experiment Phase II Data Characterization.” NREL/TP-442-6916, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
28.
Fingersh, L., Simms, D., Butterfield, C., and Jenks, M., 1995, “An Overview of the Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase III Data Acquisition System and Instrumentation,” ASME Energy and Environment Expo ’95, Houston, TX.
29.
Simms, D., Hand, M., Fingersh, L., and Jager, D., 1999, “Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase II–IV Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns.” NREL/TP-500-25950, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
30.
Simms, D., Schreck, S., Hand, M., Fingersh, L., Cotrell, J., Pierce, K., and Robinson, M., 1999, “Plans for Testing the NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment 10-m Diameter HAWT in the NASA Ames Wind Tunnel,” NREL/TP-500-27599, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
31.
Giguere, P., and Selig, M., 1999, “Design of a Tapered and Twisted Blade for the NREL Combined Experiment Rotor,” NREL/SR 500-26173 National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
32.
Simms, D., Hand, M., Fingersh, L., and Jager, D., 1999, “Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phases II–IV Test Configuration and Available Data Campaigns,” NREL/TP-500-25950, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
33.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., Robinson, M., Luttges, M., and Simms, D., 1995, “Techniques for the Determination of Local Dynamic Pressure and Angle of Attack on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine,” NREL/TP-442-7393, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden CO.
34.
Zell, P., 1993, “Performance and Test Section Flow Characteristics of the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex 80- by 120-Foot Wind Tunnel,” NASA TM 103920.
35.
Walker, J., Helin, H., and Strickland, J., 1985, “An Experimental Investigation of an Airfoil Undergoing Large Amplitude Pitching Motions,” AIAA 85-0039, AIAA 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting.
36.
Lorber, P., and Carta, F., 1987, “Unsteady Stall Penetration Experiments at High Reynolds Number,” UTRC Report R87-956939-3.
37.
Green, R., Galbraith, R., and Niven, A., 1992, “Measurements of the Dynamic Stall Vortex Convection Speed,” Aeronaut. J., pp. 319–325.
38.
Reuss Ramsay, R., Hoffman, M., and Gregorek, G., 1995, “Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the S809 Airfoil,” NREL/TP-442-7817, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO.
39.
Carta, F., 1975, “Chordwise Propagation of Dynamic Stall Cells on an Oscillating Airfoil,” AIAA 75-25, AIAA 13th Aerospace Sciences Meeting.
40.
Schreck, S., and Luttges, M., 1988, “Unsteady Separated Flow Structure: Extended K Range and Oscillations Through Zero Pitch Angle,” AIAA 88-0325, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting.
41.
Prandtl, L., and Tietjens, O., 1957, Fundamentals of Hydro- and Aeromechanics, Dover Publications, New York, pp. 197–200.
42.
Schreck, S., and Faller, W., 1995, “Encoding of Three-Dimensional Unsteady Separated Flow Field Dynamics in Neural Network Architectures,” AIAA 95-0103, AIAA 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.
43.
Schreck, S., 1989, “Experimental Investigation of the Mechanisms Underlying Vortex Kinematics in Unsteady Separated Flows,” (Dissertation) Graduate School, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
44.
Horner, M., Addington, G., Young, J., and Luttges, M., 1990, “Controlled Three-Dimensionality in Unsteady Separated Flow About a Sinusoidally Oscillating Flat Plate,” AIAA 90-0689, 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January.
45.
Winkelmann
, A.
, and Barlow
, J.
, 1980
, “Flowfield Model for a Rectangular Planform Wing Beyond Stall
,” AIAA J.
, 18
, No. 8
, pp. 1006
–1007
.Copyright © 2001
by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
