Under zero yaw conditions, rotational effects substantially and routinely augment HAWT blade aerodynamic response. To better comprehend the fluid dynamic mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, time dependent blade surface pressure data were acquired from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment (UAE), a full-scale HAWT tested in the NASA Ames 80 ft×120 ft wind tunnel. These surface pressure data were processed to obtain normal force and flow field topology data. Further analyses were carried out in a manner that allowed tip speed ratio effects to be isolated from other confounding influences. Results showed clear correlations between normal forces, flow field topologies, and tip speed ratios. These relationships changed significantly at different blade radial locations, pointing to the complex three-dimensional flow physics present on rotating HAWT blades.

1.
Butterfield, C., Hansen, A., Simms, D., and Scott, G., 1991, “Dynamic Stall on Wind Turbine Blades,” NREL/TP-257-4510, December 1991. Golden, CO, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
2.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., Robinson, M., Luttges, M., and Simms, D., 1994, “Evidence That Aerodynamic Effects, Including Dynamic Stall, Dictate HAWT Structure Loads and Power Generation in Highly Transient Time Frames,” NREL/TP-441-7080, August 1994, Golden, CO, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
3.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., and Robinson, M., 1995, “Dynamic Stall Occurrence on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade,” NREL/TP-442-6912, July 1995. Golden, CO, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
4.
Robinson, M., Galbraith, R., Shipley, D., and Miller, M., 1995, “Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” AIAA Pap. 95-0526.
5.
Huyer
,
S.
,
Simms
,
D.
, and
Robinson
,
M.
,
1996
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics Associated With a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
,”
AIAA J.
,
34
, pp.
1410
1419
.
6.
Robinson, M., Simms, D., Hand, M., and Schreck, S., 1999, “Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamics: Three-Dimensional, Unsteady, and Separated Flow Influences,” FEDSM99-S295-01, Third ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference.
7.
Schreck, S., Robinson, M., Hand, M., and Simms, D., 2000, “HAWT Dynamic Stall Response Asymmetries Under Yawed Flow Conditions,” AIAA Pap. 2000-0040.
8.
Schreck
,
S.
,
Robinson
,
M.
,
Hand
,
M.
, and
Simms
,
D.
,
2001
, “
Blade Dynamic Stall Vortex Kinematics for a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine in Yawed Conditions
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
123
, pp.
272
281
.
9.
Himmelskamp, H., 1945, “Profiluntersuchungen an einem umlaufenden Propeller,” Dissertation, Gottingen; Mitt. Max-Planck-Institut fur Stromungsforschung Gottingen Nr. 2, 1950.
10.
Banks
,
W.
, and
Gadd
,
G.
,
1963
, “
Delaying Effect of Rotation on Laminar Separation
,”
AIAA J.
,
1
, pp.
941
942
.
11.
McCroskey
,
W.
, and
Yaggy
,
P.
,
1968
, “
Laminar Boundary Layers on Helicopter Rotors in Forward Flight
,”
AIAA J.
,
6
, pp.
1919
1926
.
12.
McCroskey, W. J., 1971, “Measurements of Boundary Layer Transition, Separation and Streamline Direction on Rotating Blades,” NASA TN D-6321.
13.
Madsen
,
H.
, and
Christensen
,
H.
,
1990
, “
On the Relative Importance of Rotational, Unsteady and Three-Dimensional Effects on the HAWT Rotor Aerodynamics
,”
Wind Eng.
,
14
, pp.
405
415
.
14.
Barnsley
,
M.
, and
Wellicome
,
J.
,
1992
, “
Wind Tunnel Investigation of Stall Aerodynamics for a 1.0 m Horizontal Axis Rotor
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
39
, pp.
11
21
.
15.
Ronsten
,
G.
,
1992
, “
Static Pressure Measurements on a Rotating and a Non-Rotating 2.375 m Wind Turbine Blade. Comparison With 2D Calculations
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
39
, pp.
105
118
.
16.
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Robinson
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Rotational Augmentation of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade Aerodynamic Response
,”
Wind Energy
,
5
, pp.
133
150
.
17.
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Robinson
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Boundary Layer State and Flow Field Structure Underlying Rotational Augmentation of Blade Aerodynamic Response
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
125
, pp.
448
456
.
18.
Schreck, S., Sørensen, N., and Robinson, M., 2003, “Aerodynamic Structures and Processes in Rotationally Augmented Flow Fields,” Proceedings of the 2003 European Wind Energy Conference.
19.
Eggers, A., and Digumarthi, R., 1992, “Approximate Scaling of Rotational Effects on Mean Aerodynamic Moments and Power Generated by CER Blades Operating in Deep-Stalled Flow,” 11th ASME Wind Energy Symposium.
20.
Snel, H., Houwink, R., and Piers, W., 1992, “Sectional Prediction of 3D Effects for Separated Flow on Rotating Blades,” 18th European Rotorcraft Forum.
21.
Tangler, J., and Selig, M., “An Evaluation of an Empirical Model for Stall Delay Due to Rotation for HAWTS,” NREL/CP 440-23258, Golden, CO, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
22.
Corrigan, J., and Schillings, J., 1994, “Empirical Model for Stall Delay Due to Rotation,” American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialist Conference.
23.
Butterfield, C., Musial, W., and Simms, D., 1992, “Combined Experiment Phase I Final Report,” NREL/TP-257-4655. Golden, CO, Nat’l. Renewable Energy Lab.
24.
Miller, M., Shipley, D., Young, T., Robinson, M., Luttges, M., and Simms, D., 1995, “Combined Experiment Phase II Data Characterization,” NREL/TP 442-6916, Golden, CO, Nat’l. Renewable Energy Lab.
25.
Fingersh, L., Simms, D., Butterfield, C., and Jenks, M., 1995, “An Overview of the Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase III Data Acquisition System and Instrumentation,” ASME Energy and Environment Expo ’95, Houston, TX.
26.
Acker, T., “Further Analysis of Data From the Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment, Phase III and Phase IV,” Task 2 Report, Subcontr. XAT-8-18211-01, Golden, CO, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
27.
Simms, D., Schreck, S., Hand, M., Fingersh, L., Cotrell, J., Pierce, K., and Robinson, M., 1999, “Plans for Testing the NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment 10-m Diameter HAWT in the NASA Ames Wind Tunnel,” NREL/TP-500-27599, Golden, CO, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
28.
Giguere, P., and Selig, M., 1999, “Design of a Tapered and Twisted Blade for the NREL Combined Experiment Rotor,” NREL/SR 500-26173, Golden, CO, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
29.
Zell, P., 1993, “Performance and Test Section Flow Characteristics of the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex 80- by 120-Foot Wind Tunnel,” NASA TM 103920.
30.
Brand, A., 1994, “To Estimate the Angle of Attack of an Airfoil From the Pressure Distribution,” ECN Technical Report, ECN-R-94-002.
31.
Schepers, J., 1995, “Angle of Attack in Aerodynamic Field Measurements on Wind Turbines,” ECN Technical Report.
32.
Shipley, D., Miller, M., Robinson, M., and Luttges, M., 1995, “Techniques for the Determination of Local Dynamic Pressure and Angle of Attack on a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine,” NREL Technical Report TP-442-7393.
33.
Whale, J., Fisichella, C., and Selig, M., 1999, “Correcting Inflow Measurements From HAWTs Using a Lifting-Surface Code,” AIAA 99-0040, 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symposium.
34.
van Bussel, G., 1995, “The Aerodynamics of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Rotors Explored With Asymptotic Expansion Methods,” thesis Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands.
35.
McCullough, G., and Gault, D., 1952, “Examples of Three Representative Types of Airfoil-Section Stall at Low Speed,” NACA TN-2502.
36.
Mabey
,
D.
,
1972
, “
Analysis and Correlation of Data on Pressure Fluctuations in Separated Flow
,”
J. Aircraft
,
9
, pp.
642
645
.
37.
Forsching
,
H.
, and
Zingel
,
H.
,
1988
, “
Motion-Induced Unsteady Airloads on an Oscillating Low-Aspect-Ratio Trapezoidal Half-Wing in Separated Flow
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
2
, pp.
515
539
.
38.
Jupp, M., Coton, F., Green, R., and Galbraith, R., 1998, “
An Analysis of a Pitching Delta Wing Using High Resolution Pressure Measurements,” AIAA-98-2743.
You do not currently have access to this content.