For load measurements conducted on current wind turbines according to technical specification IEC 61400-13 load-based as well as analytically determined calibrations are possible. The uncertainties involved in load measurements due to the employment of these two methods may vary from application to application, which should be documented by the accredited laboratory and taken into account by the wind turbine designer∕manufacturer. To this end, a comparative study is conducted to define the measurement uncertainties when applying load-based or analytical calibration. Examples are presented for the resulting uncertainties and both techniques are assessed with respect not only to the uncertainties introduced but also to the specific requirements of each application. Although the analysis of the uncertainties involved especially in the analytical calibration regarded the primary uncertainty sources, from the results it is shown that the mechanical calibration should be preferred to the analytical one wherever possible. However, since the wind turbines and their structural components are becoming larger the mechanical calibration might not always be possible. Moreover, given that the problem of imposing loads of large magnitude, that is, of magnitude comparable to the ultimate loads expected to be applied on the structure will become more difficult in the future due to the continuous enlargement of the wind turbine and its components, probably more reliable results can be attained by use of a combination of both methods.

1.
Bruhn
,
O.
,
Soeker
,
H.
,
Grapentin
,
M.
,
Braam
,
H.
,
Mouzakis
,
F.
,
Petersen
,
S. M.
,
Kleinselbeck
,
T.
, and
Oiz Vasquez
,
A.
, 2006, “
MEASNET Loads—Commenting IEC-Dash-13
,”
Proceedings of the Eighth German Wind Energy Conference, DEWEK2006
.
2.
2001 “
Wind Turbine Generator Systems, Part 13: Measurement of Mechanical Loads
,” IEC∕TS 61400–13:2001, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
3.
Matal
,
O.
,
Uhnavy
,
T.
,
Klinga
,
J.
,
Zaloudek
,
J.
, and
Simo
,
T.
, 1996, “
On-Line Strain and Temperature Monitoring and Loads Evaluation of a 315kW Wind Turbine Tower
,”
Proccedings of the European Wind Energy Conference 1996
,
A.
Zervos
,
H.
Ehmann
, and
P.
Helm
, eds.,
H. S. Stephens & Associates
,
Göteborg, Sweden
, pp.
960
963
.
4.
Seifert
,
H.
,
Hunter
,
R.
,
Morfiadakis
,
E.
,
Palacios
,
A. G.
,
van der Borg
,
N.
,
Robertson
,
N.
, and
Pedersen
,
S.
, 1996, “
Mechanical Load Measurements
,” European Wind Turbine Standards Final Report No. JOU2-CT93-0387.
5.
Morfiadakis
,
E.
,
Papadopoulos
,
K.
,
van de Borg
,
N.
,
Petersen
,
S. M.
, and
Seifert
,
H.
, 1999, “
Assessment of Wind Turbine Load Measurement Instrumentation
,”
Proceedings of EWEC 1999
,
Nice
,
France
, pp.
675
678
.
6.
Papadopoulos
,
K. H.
,
Morfiadakis
,
E.
,
Chaviaropoulos
,
P.
,
Foussekis
,
D.
,
Hamelink
,
J.
,
Heijdra
,
J. J.
,
Joergensen
,
E. R.
,
Lekou
,
D. J.
,
Petersen
,
S. M.
,
Philippidis
,
T. P.
,
Seifert
,
H.
, and
van der Borg
,
N.
, 1998, “
Wind Turbine Load Measurement Instrumentation
,” (Task 3) European Wind Turbine Testing Procedure Development, Final Report No. SMT4-CT96-2116, Centre for Renewable Energy Sources, Pikermi, Greece.
7.
van der Wekken
,
A. J. P.
, and
Lagerway
,
H. L.
, 1994, “
Verification of Mechanical Loads on the Lagerway LW18∕80 and LW27∕250
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth European Wind Energy Association Conference and Exhibition 1994
,
Thessaloniki
,
Greece
,
J. L.
Tsipouridis
, ed., Oral Sessions—Vol.
2
, pp.
890
894
.
8.
Van der Borg
,
N. J. C. M.
, and
Van Dam
,
J. J. D.
, 1998, “
The Experimental Quantification of Specific Uncertainty Sources in Wind Turbine Blade Load Measurements
,” Technical Report No. ECN-C--97–105, Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, Petten, The Netherlands.
9.
Papadopoulos
,
K. H.
,
Morfiadakis
,
E.
,
Philippidis
,
T. P.
, and Lekou D., 2000, “
Assessment of Strain-Gauge Technique for Wind Turbine Blade Load Measurements
,”
Wind Energy
1095-4244,
3
, pp.
35
65
.
10.
Hoffmann
,
K.
, “
Applying the Wheatstone Bridge Circuit
,” HBM W1569-1.0en, HBM, Darmstadt, Germany, http://www.hbm.com/SEURLF/ASP/SFS/PAGEID.9/MM.5,48,-1/SFE/page. htmhttp://www.hbm.com/SEURLF/ASP/SFS/PAGEID.9/MM.5,48,-1/SFE/page. htm.
11.
ISO
, 1993, “
Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
,” International Organization for Standardization.
12.
Vishay
, 1988, “
Shunt Calibration of Strain Gage Instrumentation
,” Measurements Group Tech Note No. TN-514, http://www.vishay.com/brands/measurements_group/guide/tn/tn514/514index.htmhttp://www.vishay.com/brands/measurements_group/guide/tn/tn514/514index.htm.
13.
Hoffmann
,
K.
, 1987,
An Introduction to Measurements Using Strain Gages
,
Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH
,
Darmstadt, Germany
, Chap. 6–5, p.
168
, in German.
14.
Vishay Measurements Group, Inc.
, 1987, “
The Strain Gage Measurement System
,”
Experimental Stress Analysis Notebook
,
7
,
2
9
.
You do not currently have access to this content.