The advent of a new generation of transient rotating turbine simulation facilities, where engine values of Reynolds and Mach number are matched simultaneously together with the relevant rotational parameters for dimensional similitude (Dunn et al., 1988; Epstein and Guenette, 1984; Ainsworth et al., 1988), has provided the stimulus for developing improved instrumentation for investigating the aerodynamic flows in these stages. Much useful work has been conducted in the past using hot-wire and laser anemometers. However, hot-wire anemometers are prone to breakage in the high-pressure flows required for correct Reynolds numbers. Furthermore, some laser techniques require a longer run-time than these transient facilities permit, and generally yield velocity information only, giving no data on loss production. Advances in semiconductor aerodynamic probes are beginning to fulfill this perceived need. This paper describes advances made in the design, construction, and testing of two and three-dimensional fast response aerodynamic probes, where semiconductor pressure sensors are mounted directly on the surface of the probes, using techniques that have previously been successfully used on the surface of rotor blades (Ainsworth et al., 1991). These are to be used to measure Mach number and flow direction in compressible unsteady flow regimes. In the first section, a brief review is made of the sensor and associated technology that has been developed to permit a flexible design of fast response aerodynamic probe. Following this, an extensive program of testing large-scale aerodynamic models of candidate geometries for suitable semiconductor scale probes is described, and the results of these discussed. The conclusions of these experiments, conducted for turbine representative mean and unsteady flows, yielded new information for optimizing the design of the small-scale semiconductor probes, in terms of probe geometry, sensor placement, and aerodynamic performance. Details are given of a range of wedge and pyramid semiconductor probes constructed, and the procedures used in calibrating and making measurements with them. Differences in performance are discussed, allowing the experimenter to choose an appropriate probe for the particular measurement required. Finally, the application of prototype semiconductor probes in a transient rotor experiment at HP turbine representative conditions is described, and the data so obtained are compared with CFD solutions of the unsteady viscous flow-field.

1.
Ainsworth, R. W., Schultz, M. R., Davies, C. J., Forth, M. A., Oldfield, M. L. G., and Sheard, A. G., 1988, “A Transient Flow Facility for the Study of the Thermofluid-Dynamics of a Full Scale Stage Turbine Under Engine Representative Conditions,” ASME Paper No. 88-GT-144.
2.
Ainsworth, R. W., Allen, J. L., and Dietz, A. J., 1989, “Methods for Making Unsteady Aerodynamic Pressure Measurements in a Rotating Turbine Stage,” AGARD PEP CPP-468.
3.
Ainsworth, R. W., and Allen, J. L., 1990, “Investigating the Performance of Miniature Semi-conductor Pressure Transducers for Use in Fast Response Aerodynamic Probes,” Proceedings of 10th Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Flows, Brussels, Belgium.
4.
Ainsworth
R. W.
,
Dietz
A. J.
, and
Nunn
T. A.
,
1991
, “
The Use of Semiconductor Sensors for Blade Surface Pressure Measurement
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
113
, p.
159
159
.
5.
Ainsworth, R. W., and Stickland, A. D., 1992, “Experimenting With Fast Response Aerodynamic Probe Geometries,” Proc. of the 11th Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines, Munich, Germany.
6.
Cherrett, M. A., Bryce, J. D., and Hodson, H. P., 1992, “3D Pneumatic and 2D Dynamic Probes: Their Development and Subsequent Use in a Transonic Fan,” Proc. of 11th Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines, Munich, Germany.
7.
Dominy
R. G.
, and
Hodson
H. P.
,
1993
, “
An Investigation of Factors Influencing the Calibration of Five-Hole Probes for Three-Dimensional Flow Measurements
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
513
519
.
8.
Dunn
M. G.
,
Seymoor
P. J.
,
Woodward
S. H.
,
George
W. K.
, and
Chupp
R. E.
,
1988
, “
Phase-Resolved Heat-Flux Measurements on the Blade of a Full-Scale Rotating Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 88-GT-173;
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
111
, 1989, pp.
8
19
.
9.
Epstein, A. H., and Guenette, G. R., 1984, “The MIT Blowdown Facility,” ASME Paper No. 84-GT-116.
10.
Giles
M. B.
,
1988
, “
Calculation of Unsteady Wake Rotor Interaction
,”
AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
4
, pp.
356
362
.
11.
Heneka, A., 1983, “Instantaneous Three Dimensional Flow Measurements With a Four Hole Wedge Probe,” Proc. 7th Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines, Aachen, Germany.
12.
Koschel, W., and Pretzsch, P., 1988, “Development and Investigation of Cone Type Five Hole Probes for Small Gas Turbines,” presented at the 9th Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines, Oxford, United Kingdom.
13.
Sitaram
N.
, and
Treatser
A. L.
,
1985
, “
A Simplified Method of Using Four Hole Probes to Measure Three-Dimensional Flow Fields
,”
ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering
, Vol.
107
, pp.
31
35
.
14.
Shepherd
I. C.
,
1981
, “
A Four Hole Pressure Probe for Fluid Flow Measurements in Three Dimensions
,”
ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering
, Vol.
103
, No.
4
, pp.
590
594
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.