This paper describes the impact of axial slots on the flow field in a transonic rotor blade row. The presented results are completely based on time-accurate three-dimensional numerical simulations of a high pressure compressor front stage with and without casing treatment. Two different axial positions of a casing treatment consisting of axial slots were tested for their impact on flow stability and efficiency. The first tested position (configuration 1) was chosen in a conventional way. The slots extend approximately from the leading up to the trailing edge of the rotor blades. As expected, the simulations of the compressor stage with this configuration showed a significant increase in flow stability near surge compared to the solid wall case. However, a non-negligible decrease in efficiency is also observed. Analyses of flow interactions between casing treatment and rotor blade rows under transonic conditions lead to the general conclusion that the stabilizing effect of circumferential grooves or axial slots mainly results from their impact on the tip leakage flow and its resulting vortex. A characteristic vortex inside the slots is observed in the simulations with the conventionally positioned casing treatment. This vortex removes fluid out of downstream parts of the blade passage and feeds it back into the main flow further upstream. The resulting impact on the tip leakage flow is responsible for the increased flow stability. However, the interaction between the configuration 1 casing treatment flow and the blade passage flow results in a significant relocation of the blade passage shock in the downstream direction. This fact is a main explanation for the observed decrease in compressor efficiency. A second slot position (configuration 2) was tested with the objective to improve compressor efficiency. The casing treatment was shifted upstream, so that only 25% of the blade chord remained under the slots. The simulations carried out demonstrate that this shift positively affects the resulting efficiency, but maintains the increased level of flow stability. A time-accurate analysis of the flow shows clearly that the modified casing treatment stabilizes the tip leakage vortex and reduces the influence on the flow inside the blade passage.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
flow instability, compressors, transonic flow, computational fluid dynamics, vortices
Topics:
Blades, Compressors, Flow (Dynamics), Vortices, Rotors, Leakage, Simulation, Leakage flows, Pressure
1.
Furukawa, M., Inoue, M., Saiki, K., and Yamada, K., 1998, “The Role of Tip Leakage Vortex Breakdown in Compressor Rotor Aerodynamics,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-239.
2.
Schlechtriem, S., and Lo¨tzerich, M., 1997, “Breakdown of Tip Leakage Vortices in Compressors at Flow Conditions Close to Stall,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-041.
3.
Hofman, W., and Ballmann, J., 2002, “Tip Clearance Vortex Development and Shock-Vortex-Interaction in a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor,” AIAA Paper No. 2002-0083.
4.
Wilke, I., and Kau, H.-P., 2002, “A Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Casing Treatments on the Tip Leakage Flow in a HPC Front Stage,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30642.
5.
Hoeger, M., Fritsch, G., and Bauer, D., 1998, “Numerical Simulation of the Shock Tip Leakage Vortex Interaction in a HPC-Front Stage,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-261.
6.
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
Nikkanen
,
J. P.
,
Haddad
,
D. E.
,
Mazzawy
,
R. S.
, and
Joslyn
,
H. D.
,
1979
, “
A Fundamental Criterion for the Application of Rotor Casing Treatment
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
101
, pp.
237
–
243
.
7.
Crook
,
A. J.
,
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
, and
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
,
1993
, “
Numerical Simulation of Compressor Endwall and Casing Treatment Flow Phenomena
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
501
–
512
.
8.
Qing, Y., Qiushi, L., and Ling, L., 2002, “The Experimental Researches on Improving Operating Stability of a Transonic Fan,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30640.
9.
Rabe, D. C., and Hah, C., 2002, “Application of Casing Circumferential Grooves for Improved Stall Margin in a Transonic Axial Compressor,” GT-2002-30641.
10.
Ghila, A., and Tourlidakis, 2001, “Computational Analysis of Passive Stall Delay Through Vaned Recess Treatment,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0342.
11.
Thompson, D. W., King, P. I., and Rabe, D. C., 1997, “Experimental Investigation of Stepped Tip Gap Effects on the Performance of a Transonic Axial-Flow Compressor Rotor,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-7.
12.
Fujita
,
H.
, and
Takata
,
H.
,
1984
, “
A Study on Configurations of Casing Treatment for Axial Flow Compressors
,”
JSME
,
27
(
230
), pp.
1675
–
1681
.
13.
Takata, H., and Tsukuda, Y., 1976, “Stall Margin Improvement by Casing Treatment—Its Mechanism and Effectiviness,” ASME Paper No. 76-GT-A.
14.
Wilke, I., and Kau, H.-P., 2000, “CFD-Simulationen von Verdichterstufen mit Casing Treatment,” DGLR Kongress 2000.
15.
Gerolymos, G. A., and Vallet, I., “Tip-Clearance and Secondary Flows in a Transonic Compressor Rotor,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-366.
16.
Saathoff
,
H.
, and
Stark
,
U.
,
2000
, “
Endwall Boundary Layer Separation in a High-Stagger Compressor Cascade and a Single-Stage Axial-Flow Low-Speed Compressor
,”
Forschung im Ingenuieurwesen
,
65
(
8
), pp.
217
–
224
.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.