Linear cascade measurements for the aerodynamic performance of a family of three transonic, high-pressure (HP) turbine blades have been presented previously by the authors. The airfoils were designed for the same inlet and outlet velocity triangles but varied in their loading distributions. The previous papers presented results for the design incidence at various exit Mach numbers, and for off-design incidence at the design exit Mach number of 1.05. Results from the earlier studies indicated that by shifting the loading towards the rear of the airfoil an improvement in the profile loss performance of the order of 20% could be obtained near the design Mach number at design incidence. Measurements performed at off-design incidence, but still at the design Mach number, showed that the superior performance of the aft-loaded blade extended over a range of incidence from about $−5.0deg$ to $+5.0deg$ relative to the design value. For the current study, additional measurements were performed at off-design Mach numbers from about 0.5 to 1.3 and for incidence values of $−10.0deg$, $+5.0deg$, and $+10.0deg$ relative to design. The corresponding Reynolds numbers, based on outlet velocity and true chord, varied from roughly $4×105$ to $10×105$. The measurements included midspan losses, blade loading distributions, and base pressures. In addition, two-dimensional Navier–Stokes computations of the flow were performed to help in the interpretation of the experimental results. The results show that the superior loss performance of the aft-loaded profile, observed at design Mach number and low values of off-design incidence, does not extend readily to off-design Mach numbers and larger values of incidence. In fact, the measured midspan loss performance for the aft-loaded blade was found to be inferior to, or at best equal to, that of the baseline, midloaded airfoil at most combinations of off-design Mach number and incidence. However, based on the observations made at design and off-design flow conditions, it appears that aft-loading can be a viable design philosophy to employ in order to reduce the losses within a blade row provided the rearward deceleration is carefully limited. The loss performance of the front-loaded blade is inferior or at best equal to that of the other two blades for all operating conditions.

1.
Vijayaraghavan
,
S. B.
, and
Kavanagh
,
P.
, 1988, “
Effect of Free-Stream Turbulence, Reynolds Number, and Incidence on Axial Turbine Cascade Performance
,” ASME Paper 88-GT-152.
2.
Goobie
,
S. M.
,
Moustapha
,
S. H.
, and
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, 1989, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Incidence on the Two-Dimensional Flow
,”
Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE)
, pp.
197
204
, Athen, Greece, Sept. 4-9.
3.
Tremblay
,
B.
,
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, and
Moustapha
,
S. H.
, 1990, “
,” ASME Paper 90-GT-314.
4.
Graham
,
C. G.
, and
Kost
,
F. H.
, 1979, “
Shock Boundary Layer Interaction on High Turning Transonic Turbine Cascade
,” ASME Paper 79-GT-37.
5.
Št’astný
,
M.
,
Šafařík
,
P.
,
Hořejší
,
I.
, and
Matas
,
R.
, 1997, “
Flow Around the Sections of Rotor Blading of a Turbine Stage With Relatively Long Blades at Off-Design Conditions
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
0957-6509,
211
, pp.
207
213
.
6.
Jeffries
,
M. S.
, 2001, “
Initial Investigations of Transonic Turbine Aerodynamics Using the Carleton University High-Speed Wind Tunnel
,” Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
7.
Jouini
,
D. B. M.
, 2000, “
Experimental Investigation of Two Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades at Off-Design Conditions
,” Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
8.
Patterson
,
D. J.
, and
Hoeger
,
M.
, 1986, “
The Effect of Reynolds Number and Velocity Distribution on LP Turbine Cascade Performance
,” ASME Paper 86-GT-271.
9.
Hashimoto
,
K.
, and
Kimura
,
T.
, 1984, “
Preliminary Study on Forward Loaded Cascades Designed with Inverse Method for Low Pressure Turbine
,” ASME Paper 84-GT-65.
10.
Hoheisel
,
H.
,
Kiock
,
R.
,
Lichtfuss
,
H. J.
, and
Fottner
,
L.
, 1987, “
Influence of Free-Stream Turbulence and Blade Pressure Gradient on Boundary Layer and Loss Behavior of Turbine Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
109
, pp.
210
219
.
11.
Howell
,
R. J.
,
Ramesh
,
O. N.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Harvey
,
N. W.
, and
Schulte
,
V.
, 2001, “
High Lift and Aft-Loaded Profiles for Low-Pressure Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
181
188
.
12.
Amecke
,
J.
, and
Šafařík
,
P.
, 1995, “
Data Reduction of Wake Flow Measurements With Injection of Other Gas
,” Technical Report No. DLR-FB 95-32, DLR.
13.
Moffat
,
R.
, 1988, “
Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
0894-1777,
1
, pp.
3
17
.
14.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Allmaras
,
S. R.
, 1994, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
Rech. Aerosp.
0034-1223,
1
, pp.
5
21
.
15.
Mee
,
D. J.
,
Baines
,
N. C.
,
Oldfield
,
M. L. G.
, and
Dickens
,
T. E.
, 1992, “
An Examination of the Contributions to Loss on a Transonic Turbine Blade in Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
155
162
.
16.
Corriveau
,
D.
, and
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, 2002, “
Impact of Flow Quality in Transonic Cascade Wind Tunnels: Measurements in an HP Turbine Cascade
,”
Proceedings 23rd Int. Congress of Aeronautical Science (ICAS)
17.
Corriveau
,
D.
, and
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, 2004, “
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
126
, pp.
288
296
.
18.
Corriveau
,
D.
, and
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, 2004, “
Experimental and Numerical In*vestigation on the Performance of a Family of Three HP Transonic Turbine Blades
,” ASME Paper GT2004-53087.
19.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanism in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.