This paper presents two low-cost alternatives for turbine blade surface heat transfer and fluid dynamics measurements. These models embody careful compromises between typical academic and full-scale turbomachinery experiments and represent a comprehensive strategy to develop experiments that can directly test shortcomings in current turbomachinery simulation tools. A full contextual history of the wide range of approaches to simulate turbine flow conditions is presented, along with a discussion of their deficiencies. Both models are simplifications of a linear cascade: the current standard for simulating two-dimensional turbine blade geometries. A single passage model is presented as a curved duct consisting of two half-blade geometries, carefully designed inlet and exit walls and inlet suction. This facility was determined to be best suited for heat transfer measurements where minimal surface conduction losses are necessary to allow accurate numerical model replication. A double passage model is defined as a single blade with two precisely designed outer walls, which is most appropriate for flow measurements. The design procedures necessary to achieve a desired flow condition are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: eatonj@stanford.edu
Article navigation
July 2009
Research Papers
Evaluation of Alternatives for Two-Dimensional Linear Cascade Facilities
Paul M. Kodzwa, Jr.,
Paul M. Kodzwa, Jr.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
Amanda Vicharelli,
Amanda Vicharelli
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
Gorazd Medic,
Gorazd Medic
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher J. Elkins,
Christopher J. Elkins
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
John K. Eaton,
John K. Eaton
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
e-mail: eatonj@stanford.edu
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Search for other works by this author on:
Gregory M. Laskowski,
Gregory M. Laskowski
Energy and Propulsion Technology Laboratories,
General Electric Global Research Center
, Niskayuna, NY 12309
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul A. Durbin
Paul A. Durbin
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Iowa State University
, Ames, IA 50011
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul M. Kodzwa, Jr.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Amanda Vicharelli
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Gorazd Medic
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
Christopher J. Elkins
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305
John K. Eaton
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Flow Physics and Computation Division,
Stanford University
, Stanford, CA 94305e-mail: eatonj@stanford.edu
Gregory M. Laskowski
Energy and Propulsion Technology Laboratories,
General Electric Global Research Center
, Niskayuna, NY 12309
Paul A. Durbin
Department of Aerospace Engineering,
Iowa State University
, Ames, IA 50011J. Turbomach. Jul 2009, 131(3): 031001 (11 pages)
Published Online: April 2, 2009
Article history
Received:
December 9, 2006
Revised:
July 26, 2008
Published:
April 2, 2009
Citation
Kodzwa, P. M., Jr., Vicharelli, A., Medic, G., Elkins, C. J., Eaton, J. K., Laskowski, G. M., and Durbin, P. A. (April 2, 2009). "Evaluation of Alternatives for Two-Dimensional Linear Cascade Facilities." ASME. J. Turbomach. July 2009; 131(3): 031001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2985073
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Design Guidelines for Inertial Particle Separators
J. Turbomach
Impact of Trailing Edge Damage on Nozzle Guide Vane Aerodynamic Performance
J. Turbomach (October 2025)
Related Articles
Predicting the Profile Loss of High-Lift Low Pressure Turbines
J. Turbomach (March,2012)
Direct Numerical Simulations of Transitional Flow in Turbomachinery
J. Turbomach (October,2006)
Heat Transfer Study in a Linear Turbine Cascade Using a Thermal Boundary Layer Measurement Technique
J. Heat Transfer (October,2007)
Inverse Design of and Experimental Measurements in a Double-Passage Transonic Turbine Cascade Model
J. Turbomach (July,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Boundary Layer Analysis
Centrifugal Compressors: A Strategy for Aerodynamic Design and Analysis
Introduction
Design and Analysis of Centrifugal Compressors
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential