The current work investigates a circumferentially divided turbine volute designed such that each gas inlet feeds a separate section of the turbine wheel. Although there is a small connecting interspace formed between the nozzle and the mixed-flow rotor inlet, this design does well to preserve the exhaust gas energy in a pulsed-charged application by largely isolating the two streams entering the turbine. However, this type of volute design produces some interesting flow features as a result of unequal flows driving the turbine wheel. To investigate the influence of unequal flows, experimental data from the turbocharger facility at Imperial College have been gathered over a wide range of steady-state, unequal admission conditions. These test results show a significant drop in turbine performance with increasing pressure difference between inlets. In addition, the swallowing capacities of each gas inlet are interdependent, thus indicating some flow interaction between entries. To understand the flow physics driving the observed performance, a full 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the turbine was created. Results show a highly disturbed flow field as a consequence of the nonuniform admission. From these results, it is possible to identify the regions of aerodynamic loss responsible for the measured performance decrease. Given the unequal flows present in a double-entry design, each rotor passage sees an abrupt change in flow conditions as it rotates spanning the two feeding sectors. This operation introduces a high degree of unsteady flow into the rotor passage even when it operates in steady conditions. The amplitude and frequency of this unsteadiness will depend both on the level of unequal admission and the speed of rotor rotation. The reduced frequency associated with this disturbance supports the evidence that the flow in the rotor passage is unsteady. Furthermore, the CFD model indicates that the blade passage flow is unable to fully develop in the time available to travel between the two different sectors (entries).

1.
Szymko
,
S.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, and
Pullen
,
K. R.
, 2005, “
Experimental Evaluation of Turbocharger Turbine Performance Under Pulsating Flow Conditions
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68878.
2.
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, and
Karamanis
,
N.
, 2002, “
Mixed-Flow Turbines for Automotive Turbochargers: Steady and Unsteady Performance
,”
Int. J. Engine Res.
1468-0874,
3
(
3
), pp.
127
138
.
3.
Arcoumanis
,
C.
,
Hakeem
,
I.
,
Khezzar
,
L.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, 1995, “
Performance Evaluation of a Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine Under Pulsating Flow Conditions
,”
ASME
Paper No. 95-GT-210.
4.
Baines
,
N. C.
,
Hajilouy-Benisi
,
A.
, and
Yeo
,
J. H.
, 1994, “
The Pulse Flow Performance and Modelling of Radial Inflow Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the IMechE
, Vol.
6
, p.
209
.
5.
Pesiridis
,
A.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, 2005, “
Experimental Evaluation of Active Flow Control Mixed Flow Turbine for Automotive Turbocharger Application
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68830.
6.
Dale
,
A.
, and
Watson
,
N.
, 1986, “
Vaneless Radial Turbine Performance
,”
Proceedings of the IMechE
, Paper No. C110-86, pp.
65
76
.
7.
Rajoo
,
S.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, 2007, “
Unsteady Effect in a Nozzled Turbocharger Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-28323.
8.
Costall
,
A.
,
Rajoo
,
S.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, 2006, “
Modelling and Experimental Study of the Unsteady Effects and Their Significance for Nozzleless and Nozzled Turbine Performance
,”
THIESEL Conference on Thermo and Fluid Dynamic Processes in Diesel Engines
.
9.
Pischinger
,
F.
, and
Wunsche
,
A.
, 1977, “
The Characteristic Behaviour of Radial Turbines and Its Influence on the Turbocharging Process
,”
Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Combustion Engines
, Vol.
A
, pp.
545
568
.
10.
Capobianco
,
M.
, and
Gambarotta
,
A.
, 1993, “
Performance of a Twin-Entry Automotive Turbocharger Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. 93-ICE-2.
11.
Baines
,
N. C.
, and
Yeo
,
J. H.
, 1991, “
Flow in a Radial Turbine Under Equal and Partial Admission Conditions
,”
IMechE
Paper No. C423/002.
12.
Lymberopoulos
,
N.
,
Baines
,
N. C.
, and
Watson
,
N.
, 1988, “
Flow in Single and Twin Entry Volutes
,”
ASME
Paper No. 88-GT-59.
13.
Baines
,
N. C.
, and
Hajilouy
,
A.
, 1996, “
Twin-Entry Radial Turbine Flow Measurements Under Unsteady Flow Conditions
,”
Fourth Annual Mechanical Engineering Conference of ISME
, pp.
233
244
.
14.
Yeo
,
J. H.
, and
Baines
,
N. C.
, 1994, “
Laser Velocity Measurements in a Twin-Entry Vaneless Radial Turbocharger Turbine
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. B
1340-8054,
37
(
4
), pp.
861
870
.
15.
Wallace
,
F. J.
, and
Blair
,
G. P.
, 1965, “
The Pulsating-Flow Performance of Inward Radial-Flow Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. 65-gtp-21.
16.
Wallace
,
F. J.
,
Adgey
,
J. M.
, and
Blair
,
G. P.
, 1965, “
Performance of Inward Flow Turbines Under Unsteady Flow Conditions
,”
Proceedings of the IMechE
, p.
184
.
17.
Benson
,
R. S.
, and
Scrimshaw
,
K. H.
, 1965, “
An Experimental Investigation of Non-Steady Flow in a Radial Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the IMechE
, Vol.
180
, Part 3J, Paper No. 23.
18.
Benson
,
R. S.
, 1974, “
Nonsteady Flow in a Turbocharger Nozzleless Radial Gas Turbine
,”
SAE National Combined Farm, Construction and Industrial Machinery and Powerplant Meeting
.
19.
Mizumachi
,
N.
,
Yoshiki
,
H.
, and
Endoh
,
T.
, 1979, “
A Study on Performance of Radial Turbine Under Unsteady Flow Conditions
,” Institute of Industrial Science,
University of Tokyo
, Report No. 28.
20.
Copeland
,
C.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, and
Seiler
,
M.
, 2008, “
Unsteady Performance of a Double Entry Turbocharger Turbine With a Comparison to Steady Flow Conditions
,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50827.
21.
Copeland
,
C.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, and
Seiler
,
M.
, 2009, “
Comparison Between Steady and Unsteady Double-Entry Turbine Performance Using the Quasi-Steady Assumption
,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59290.
22.
Hajilouy-Benisi
,
A.
,
Rad
,
M.
, and
Shahhosseini
,
M. R.
, 2009, “
Flow and Performance Characteristics of a Twin-Entry Radial Turbine Under Full and Partial Admission Conditions
,”
Arch. Appl. Mech.
0939-1533,
79
, pp.
1127
1143
.
23.
Lam
,
J. K.-W.
,
Roberts
,
Q. D. H.
, and
McDonnell
,
G. T.
, 2002, “
Flow Modelling of a Turbocharger Turbine Under Pulsating Flow
,”
IMechE
, Paper No. C602/025/2002.
24.
Hellstrom
,
F.
, 2008, “
Numerical Computations of the Unsteady Flow in a Radial Turbine
,” thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH Mechanics, Stockholm, Sweden.
25.
Palfreyman
,
D.
, 2004, “
Aerodynamics of a Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine Under Steady and Pulse Flow Conditions: A Numerical Study
,” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK.
26.
Szymko
,
S.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
,
Pullen
,
K. R.
,
McGlashan
,
N. R.
, and
Chen
,
H.
, 2002, “
A High-Speed, Permanent Magnet Eddy-Current Dynamometer for Turbocharger Research
,”
Proceedings of the IMechE
, Paper No. C602-026.
27.
Szymko
,
S.
, 2006, “
The Development of an Eddy Current Dynamometer for Evaluation of Steady and Pulsating Turbocharger Turbine Performance
,” Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK.
28.
2009, CFX 12.0 User Guide.
29.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
30.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
Pullan
,
G.
, and
Curtis
,
E.
, 2005, “
Improving the Performance of a Turbine With Low-Aspect Ratio Stators by Aft-Loading
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68548.
31.
Greitzer
,
E.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
, and
Graf
,
M. B.
, 2004,
Internal Flow: Concepts and Applications
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
, Chap. 2, pp.
68
70
.
32.
Moore
,
J.
, and
Moore
,
J. G.
, 1983, “
Entropy Production Rates From Viscous Flow Calculations. Part I—A Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. 83-GT-70.
33.
Moore
,
J.
, and
Moore
,
J. G.
, 1983, “
Entropy Production Rates From Viscous Flow Calculations. II Flow in a Rectangular Elbow
,”
ASME
Paper No. 83-GT-71.
34.
Naterer
,
G. F.
, and
Camberos
,
J. A.
, 2008,
Entropy Based Design and Analysis of Fluids Engineering Systems
,
CRC
,
Boca Raton, FL
, Chap. 9, pp.
262
270
.
You do not currently have access to this content.