Abstract

Low fidelity modeling approaches remain attractive due to an unrivaled ability to predict full turbine performance maps quickly compared to high-fidelity approaches such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD), especially in the preliminary design process. As improvements in performance on a component level approach a point of diminishing returns, the ability to efficiently optimize the complete charging system for a given duty is a topic attracting significant research interest. In the case of turbocharging applications, existing engine and powertrain simulations require turbine maps to calculate the turbine performance, which are usually obtained from experimental testing. Unfortunately, the need for extrapolation is unavoidable because of the limited range of testing data available, leading to inaccuracies especially at off-design conditions. To enable intensive modeling and optimization of complete vehicle powertrains for different drive cycles, the current piece of work seeks to combine the advantages of machine learning techniques and physical meanline modeling to facilitate faster, more accurate predictions of complete turbocharger maps. This paper presents a novel methodology for turbocharger turbine rotor and nozzle performance prediction based on hybrid modeling. The turbine rotor and nozzle were parameterized to conduct CFD simulations for a wide variety of turbine geometries, which were used to form a database to train an artificial neural network (ANN). The predicted losses provided by the ANN were then utilized in the meanline code, substituting for the conventional empirical loss models. As well as removing the need for empirical loss models, modifications were undertaken to the meanline approach to further enhance modeling accuracy. First, in order to accurately characterize the stage mass flow capacity, the losses occurring in the nozzle and rotor were subdivided into those occurring before and after the throat. A second novel aspect is that the aerodynamic blockage level at the rotor throat was implemented as a variable rather than a constant value. By training the ANN to predict the variation of blockage with geometry and operating condition, a more accurate depiction of the changing secondary flow fields could be achieved. The capabilities of the hybrid meanline modeling method were evaluated on several unseen test cases. The resulting predictions of efficiency and mass flowrate demonstrated strong correlation with CFD results and experimental test results. The hybrid meanline modeling method therefore displays great potential in wide range radial turbine performance prediction with enhanced accuracy in comparison to traditional approaches.

References

1.
Futral
,
S. M.
, and
Wasserbauer
,
C. A.
,
1965
, “
Off-Design Performance Prediction With Experimental Verification for a Radial-Inflow Turbine
,” NASA, Technical Note D-2621.
2.
Connor
,
W. A.
, and
Flaxington
,
D.
,
1994
, “
A One-Dimensional Performance Prediction Method for Radial Inflow Turbines
,”
Institution of Mechanical Engineers Turbochargers and Turbocharging Conference, Paper No. C484/041/94
, pp.
271
282
.
3.
GT-Power Engine Simulation
, https://www.gtisoft.com/gt-power/, Accessed May 5, 2021.
4.
Pesiridis
,
A.
,
Salim
,
S. I. W.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
,
2012
, “
Turbocharger Matching Methodology for Improved Exhaust Energy Recovery
,”
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Turbocharging and Turbochargers
,
London, UK
,
May 15–16
, pp.
203
218
.
5.
Serrano
,
J. R.
,
Arnau
,
F. J.
,
García-Cuevas
,
L. M.
,
Dombrovsky
,
A.
, and
Tartoussi
,
H.
,
2016
, “
Development and Validation of a Radial Turbine Efficiency and Mass Flow Model at Design and Off-Design Conditions
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
128
, pp.
281
293
.
6.
Qi
,
J.
,
Reddell
,
T.
,
Qin
,
K.
,
Hooman
,
K.
, and
Jahn
,
I. H.
,
2017
, “
Supercritical CO2 Radial Turbine Design Performance as a Function of Turbine Size Parameters
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
8
), p.
081008
.
7.
Gao
,
Y.
, and
Petrie-Repar
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Validation of Mean Line Performance Prediction Method for Radial and Mixed Flow Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Turbochargers and Turbocharging
,
London, UK
,
May 16–17
, pp.
357
372
.
8.
Meitner
,
P. L.
, and
Glassman
,
A. J.
,
1980
, “
Loss Model for Off-Design Performance Analysis of Radial Turbines With Pivoting-Vane, Variable-Area Stators
,” NASA, Technical Memorandum-81532.
9.
Qiu
,
X.
,
Anderson
,
M. R.
, and
Baines
,
N. C.
,
2009
, “
Meanline Modeling of Radial Inflow Turbine With Variable Area Nozzle
,”
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Orlando, FL
,
June 8–12
, pp.
1185
1191
.
10.
Bin Mamat
,
A. M.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
,
2010
, “
Mean Line Flow Model of Steady and Pulsating Flow of a Mixed-Flow Turbine Turbocharger
,”
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Glasgow, UK
,
June 14–18
, pp.
2393
2404
.
11.
Yang
,
B.
, and
Martinez-Botas
,
R.
,
2019
, “
TURBODYNA: Centrifugal/Centripetal Turbomachinery Dynamic Simulator and Its Application on a Mixed Flow Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
141
(
10
), p.
101012
.
12.
Chiong
,
M. S.
,
Rajoo
,
S.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
, and
Costall
,
A. W.
,
2012
, “
Engine Turbocharger Performance Prediction: One-Dimensional Modeling of a Twin Entry Turbine
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
57
, pp.
68
78
.
13.
Todd
,
C. A.
, and
Futral
,
S. M.
,
1969
, “
A Fortran IV Program to Estimate the Off-Design Performance of Radial-Inflow Turbines
,” NASA, Technical Note D-5059.
14.
Gibson
,
L.
,
Galloway
,
L.
, and
Spence
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Assessment of Turbulence Model Predictions for a Centrifugal Compressor Simulation
,”
J. Glob. Power Propuls. Soc.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
142
156
.
15.
Nusbaum
,
W. J.
, and
Wasserbauer
,
C. A.
,
1967
, “
Experimental Performance Evaluation of a 4.59-Inch Radial-Inflow Turbine Over a Range of Reynolds Number
,” NASA, Technical Note D-3835.
16.
Copeland
,
C. D.
,
Newton
,
P.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R.
, and
Seiler
,
M.
,
2010
, “
The Effect of Unequal Admission on the Performance and Loss Generation in a Double-Entry Turbocharger Turbine
,”
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Glasgow, UK
,
June 14–18
, pp.
1733
1745
.
17.
McDonnell
,
G. T.
,
1999
, “
The Design, Development and Testing of a Turbine Hydraulic Dynamometer
,”
Ph.D. dissertation
,
Queen’s University of Belfast
,
Belfast, UK
.
18.
Baines
,
N. C.
,
1998
, “
A Meanline Prediction Method for Radial Turbine Efficiency in Axial and Radial Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Turbocharging and Air Management Systems
,
London, UK
,
Nov. 3–5
, pp.
3
5
.
19.
Glassman
,
A. J.
,
1995
, “
Enhanced Analysis and User’s Manual for Radial-Inflow Turbine Conceptual Design Code RTD
,” NASA, E-9538.
20.
Li
,
Z.
, and
Zheng
,
X.
,
2017
, “
Review of Design Optimization Methods for Turbomachinery Aerodynamics
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
93
, pp.
1
23
.
21.
Qin
,
R.
,
Ju
,
Y.
,
Spence
,
S.
, and
Zhang
,
C.
,
2021
, “
Metamodel-Driven Data Mining Model to Support Three-Dimensional Design of Centrifugal Compressor Stage
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
143
(
12
), p.
121013
.
22.
Liu
,
Z.
, and
Karimi
,
I. A.
,
2020
, “
Gas Turbine Performance Prediction Via Machine Learning
,”
Energy
,
192
, p.
116627
.
23.
Mishra
,
M.
, and
Srivastava
,
M.
,
2014
, “
A View of Artificial Neural Network
,”
International Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology Research (ICAETR-2014)
,
Unnao, India
,
Aug. 1–2
, pp.
1
3
.
24.
Karsoliya
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Approximating Number of Hidden Layer Neurons in Multiple Hidden Layer BPNN Architecture
,”
Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol.
,
3
(
6
), pp.
714
717
.
25.
Sharma
,
S.
,
Sharma
,
S.
, and
Athaiya
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Activation Functions in Neural Networks
,”
Tow. Data Sci.
,
6
(
12
), pp.
310
316
.
26.
Zhang
,
Z.
,
2018
, “
Improved Adam Optimizer for Deep Neural Networks
,”
IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS)
,
Banff, Canada
,
June 5–6
, pp.
1
2
.
27.
Ju
,
Y.
,
Qin
,
R.
,
Kipouros
,
T.
,
Parks
,
G.
, and
Zhang
,
C.
,
2016
, “
A High-Dimensional Design Optimisation Method for Centrifugal Impellers
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. A: J. Power Energy
,
230
(
3
), pp.
272
288
.
28.
Ju
,
Y.
,
Parks
,
G.
, and
Zhang
,
C.
,
2017
, “
A Bisection-Sampling-Based Support Vector Regression–High-Dimensional Model Representation Metamodeling Technique for High-Dimensional Problems
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
231
(
12
), pp.
2173
2186
.
29.
Walkingshaw
,
J.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
, and
Thornhill
,
D.
,
2014
, “
A Numerical and Experimental Assessment of the Use of a Turbine Utilizing Splitter Blades for an Automotive Variable Geometry Turbocharger
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
, Paper No. GT2014-26097.
You do not currently have access to this content.