This paper presents a method for identifying the free-free modes of a structure by utilizing the vibration data of the same structure with boundary conditions. In modal formulations for flexible body dynamics, modal data are primary known quantities that are obtained either experimentally or analytically. The vibration measurements may be obtained for a flexible body that is constrained differently than its boundary conditions in a multibody system. For a flexible body model in a multibody system, depending upon the formulation used, we may need a set of free-free modal data or a set of constrained modal data. If a finite element model of the flexible body is available, its vibration data can be obtained analytically under any desired boundary conditions. However, if a finite element model is not available, the vibration data may be determined experimentally. Since experimentally measured vibration data are obtained for a flexible body supported by some form of boundary conditions, we may need to determine its free-free vibration data. The aim of this study is to extract, based on experimentally obtained vibration data, the necessary free-free frequencies and the associated modes for flexible bodies to be used in multibody formulations. The available vibration data may be obtained for a structure supported either by springs or by fixed boundary conditions. Furthermore, the available modes may be either a complete set, having as many modes as the number of degrees of freedom of the associated FE model, or an incomplete set.

1.
Nikravesh, P. E., 1988, Computer Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall.
2.
Shabana, A. A., 1989, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, John Wiley & Sons.
3.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
1997
, “
Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments
,”
Multibody System Dynamics
1
, No.
2
, pp.
189
222
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4.
Ambrosio
,
J.
, and
Nikravesh
,
P. E.
,
1992
, “
Elasto-Plastic Deformation in Multibody Dynamics
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
3
, pp.
85
104
.
5.
Song
,
J. O.
, and
Haug
,
E. J.
,
1980
, “
Dynamic Analysis of Planar Flexible Mechanisms
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
24
, pp.
359
381
.
6.
Sunada
,
W.
, and
Dubowsky
,
S.
,
1981
, “
The Application of the Finite Element Method to the Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Spatial and Co-Planar Linkage Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
103
, pp.
643
651
.
7.
Shabana
,
A.
, and
Wehage
,
R. A.
,
1983
, “
Coordinate Reduction Techniques for Transient Analysis of Spatial Substructures with Large Angular Rotations
,”
Journal of Structural Mechanics
11
(
3
), pp.
401
431
.
8.
Yi, T. Y., 1996, “Structural Identification Based on Vibration Data for Flexible and Rigid Multibody System Dynamics,” Ph.D. Dissertation, AME, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
9.
Yi, T. Y., and Nikravesh, P. E., 1996, Quasi-Finite Element Method, Technical Report CAEL-96-2, AME, University of Arizona.
10.
Yi, T. Y., and Nikravesh, P. E., 1997, Prediction of Modal Characteristics due to Design Change, Proc. of DETC97/VIB-4290 ASME Design Engineering.
11.
Caesar
,
B.
, and
Peter
,
J.
,
1987
, “
Direct Update of Dynamic Mathematical Models from Modal Test Data
,”
AIAA J.
25
, pp.
1494
1499
.
12.
Foster
,
C. D.
, and
Mottershead
,
J. E.
,
1990
, “
A Method for Improving Finite Element Models by Using Experimental Data: Application Monitoring
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
32
, No.
3
, pp.
191
203
.
13.
Berman
,
A.
, and
Flannelly
,
W. G.
,
1971
, “
Theory of Incomplete Models of Dynamic Structures
,”
AIAA J.
9
, pp.
1481
1487
.
14.
Przemieniecki, J. S., 1968, Theory of Matrix Analysis, McGraw-Hill.
15.
Craig, R. R., 1981, Structural Dynamics: An Introduction to Computer Methods, John Wiley & Sons.
16.
Yoo
,
W. S.
, and
Haug
,
E. J.
,
1986
, “
Dynamics of Flexible Mechanical Systems Using Vibration and Static Correction Modes
,”
ASME J. Mech. Transm. Autom. Des.
108
, pp.
315
322
.
You do not currently have access to this content.